Audio Playback Signal Processing for Acoustic Component Lifetime Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining the lifetime of acoustic components in audio playback devices require traditional reliability testing, which is time-consuming and unnecessary when signal processing settings are changed, as they do not account for new stress conditions effectively.

Innovation Solution

Applying cycle time, cyclic stress, and timescale acceleration factors to the initial lifetime estimate of acoustic components to predict their lifespan under new signal processing settings, allowing for the calculation of a new lifetime estimate without extensive testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional reliability testing is conducted to determine the lifetime of acoustic components, then the accuracy of lifetime estimation is improved, but the time and resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifetime estimation accuracyVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by conducting reliability testing once during manufacturing to establish baseline lifetime estimates and stress parameters for acoustic components. These pre-obtained data serve as the foundation for subsequent lifetime predictions under different signal processing settings, eliminating the need for repeated extensive testing whenever settings change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by using acceleration factors that relate stress parameters (such as volume level, frequency content, duty cycle) between different signal processing settings. By mathematically transforming the baseline lifetime estimate using these parameter ratios, the system predicts lifetime under new settings without physical re-testing, thus resolving the contradiction between accuracy and time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If signal processing settings are changed to improve audio performance, then the listening experience is enhanced, but the stress on acoustic components increases reducing their lifetime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio performance qualityVSAvoidacoustic component lifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by calculating the predicted lifetime under new signal processing settings and comparing it against acceptable thresholds. When the predicted lifetime falls below the threshold, the system provides feedback to prevent applying those settings, or suggests alternative settings that maintain audio performance while preserving component lifetime. This closed-loop approach balances performance enhancement with component reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by predicting the negative impact (reduced lifetime) of proposed signal processing setting changes before they are actually applied. By evaluating the acceleration factors and predicted lifetime in advance, the system prevents harmful settings from being implemented, thus counteracting the potential damage before it occurs while still allowing beneficial performance enhancements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive reliability testing is performed for each signal processing setting, then the lifetime prediction accuracy is improved, but the complexity and cost of the process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifetime prediction accuracyVSAvoidtesting process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs copying by creating a mathematical model that replicates the relationship between stress parameters and component lifetime. Instead of physically testing each signal processing setting, the system copies the baseline test results and transforms them using acceleration factors that represent the relative stress conditions. This virtual copying approach maintains prediction accuracy while dramatically simplifying the testing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10356540B2Lifetime of an audio playback device with changed signal processing settings
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 SONOS INC
  • US10356540B2 patent drawing
  • US10356540B2 patent drawing
  • US10356540B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A first lifetime estimate is determined for a first acoustic component of a first audio playback device configured with first signal processing settings. A second audio playback device is configured with second signal processing settings. A second lifetime estimate is determined for a second acoustic component of the second audio playback device configured with the second signal processing settings, where the second lifetime estimate is determined based on first lifetime estimate and where the first acoustic component is substantially similar to the second acoustic component.