Audio Noise Floor Estimation via Cost Function Minimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing noise reduction methods fail to effectively estimate and remove background noise in user-generated audio content, especially when a quiet fragment is not available, and often discard narrow-band tonal components or make assumptions about the signal type, leading to inefficiencies and inaccuracies.

Innovation Solution

A method that divides the audio signal into buffers, determines time-frequency samples, and uses a cost function combining median and energy variation to estimate the noise floor, allowing for robust noise reduction across all types of audio signals without discarding narrow-band components or making signal-type assumptions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing noise reduction methods are used, then noise can be reduced in some cases, but they fail when no quiet fragment is available and discard narrow-band tonal components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise floor estimation reliabilityVSAvoidnarrow-band tonal components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the estimation parameters from requiring quiet fragments to using cost function minimization based on median and energy variation. This allows reliable noise floor estimation without discarding tonal components, as the cost function approach identifies noise floors through statistical properties rather than requiring silent periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of finding quiet fragments to estimate noise (traditional approach), the patent inverts the approach by finding the noise floor through cost function minimization that works even when signal is present. The method seeks the minimum cost function value rather than relying on absence of signal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Measurement precision

If methods based on fitting smooth curves through minima are used, then noise floor can be estimated, but narrow-band tonal components are discarded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise floor measurementVSAvoidnarrow-band tonal components
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces smooth curve fitting with a cost function based on median and energy variation metrics. This parameter change allows precise noise floor measurement while preserving tonal components, as the cost function operates on statistical properties of the signal rather than requiring smooth interpolation that eliminates peaks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If percentile-based noise selection is used, then noise floor can be determined, but the method is not robust to fade in and fade out of signal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise floor determination speedVSAvoidrobustness to signal variations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a cost function that incorporates feedback from both median and energy variation measures. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt to signal variations like fade in and fade out, maintaining reliable noise floor determination by continuously evaluating the cost function across different time points and selecting the minimum.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Ease of manufacture

If methods relying on signal assumptions are used, then noise reduction can be applied, but they do not generalize to all audio signal types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidgeneralization to all audio types
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal noise floor estimation method based on cost function minimization that works for all audio signal types. The approach uses general statistical properties (median and energy variation) rather than signal-specific assumptions, making it adaptable to speech, music, and other audio content while maintaining implementation simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12033649B2Noise floor estimation and noise reduction
Publication Date: 2024.07.09 DOLBY INTERNATIONAL AB
  • US12033649B2 patent drawing
  • US12033649B2 patent drawing
  • US12033649B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments are disclosed for noise floor estimation and noise reduction, In an embodiment, a method comprises: obtaining an audio signal; dividing the audio signal into a plurality of buffers; determining time-frequency samples for each buffer of the audio signal; for each buffer and for each frequency, determining a median (or mean) and a measure of an amount of variation of energy based on the samples in the buffer and samples in neighboring buffers that together span a specified time range of the audio signal; combining the median (or mean) and the measure of the amount of variation of energy into a cost function; for each frequency: determining a signal energy of a particular buffer of the audio signal that corresponds to a minimum value of the cost function; selecting the signal energy as the estimated noise floor of the audio signal; and reducing, using the estimated noise floor, noise in the audio signal.