Audio Object Encoding with Decoder-Guided Parameter Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing audio object encoding and decoding systems suffer from suboptimal quality and cross-interference issues, limiting independent manipulation and flexibility, especially in volume control and frequency adjustments, due to non-reversible down-mix processes.

Innovation Solution

An encoder that receives audio objects, encodes them into a number of audio signals with parametric data, and modifies these signals based on remote control data to improve user interaction, allowing for independent control of audio objects with reduced cross-interference, using techniques such as down-mix weight modification and frequency-specific adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If audio objects are down-mixed to a reduced number of channels for transmission, then bandwidth efficiency and compatibility are improved, but the ability to independently manipulate individual audio objects deteriorates due to cross-interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of audio channelsVSAvoidindependent manipulation of audio objects
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The audio signal is segmented into multiple independent audio objects, each representing a distinct sound source. The encoder processes each object separately, extracting individual parameters that describe spatial properties. This segmentation allows the decoder to independently manipulate each audio object while maintaining overall mix integrity, resolving the contradiction between channel reduction and manipulation flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parametric representation where each audio object is described by a set of parameters (spatial position, volume, frequency characteristics) rather than transmitting full channel signals. By changing and transmitting these parameters separately, the system enables independent manipulation of individual objects in the down-mixed signal, maintaining adaptability while reducing channel quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If parametric data is used to represent audio objects after down-mixing, then transmission efficiency is improved, but decoding accuracy deteriorates due to loss of original signal information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission volumeVSAvoidaudio object reconstruction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The encoder performs preliminary processing by extracting audio objects from the multi-channel signal before down-mixing, and computes their parametric representations in advance. This preliminary action preserves the essential characteristics of each object (spatial position, volume, frequency content) in parameter form, allowing accurate reconstruction at the decoder without transmitting the full original signal, thus balancing data efficiency with reconstruction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Parametric data serves as an intermediary between the original multi-channel audio objects and the down-mixed signal. Instead of directly transmitting down-mixed channels or full original signals, the system transmits intermediate parametric representations that capture the essential properties of each audio object, enabling accurate reconstruction while maintaining transmission efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If audio objects are encoded independently with full manipulation capability, then flexibility and user control are improved, but system complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser control of audio objectsVSAvoidencoding and decoding system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential parameters needed for audio object representation (spatial position, volume, frequency characteristics) from the full audio signals. By taking out and transmitting only these critical parameters rather than complete signal data, the system enables flexible user control of individual objects while significantly reducing encoding and decoding complexity compared to processing full independent audio streams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS8271290B2Encoding and decoding of audio objects
Publication Date: 2012.09.18 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US8271290B2 patent drawing
  • US8271290B2 patent drawing
  • US8271290B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An audio system comprises an encoder (209) which encodes audio objects in an encoding unit (403) that generates a down-mix audio signal and parametric data representing the plurality of audio objects. The down-mix audio signal and parametric data is transmitted to a decoder (215) which comprises a decoding unit (301) which generates approximate replicas of the audio objects and a rendering unit (303) which generates an output signal from the audio objects. The decoder (215) furthermore contains a processor (501) for generating encoding modification data which is sent to the encoder (209). The encoder (209) then modifies the encoding of the audio objects, and in particular modifies the parametric data, in response to the encoding modification data. The approach allows manipulation of the audio objects to be controlled by the decoder (215) but performed fully or partly by the encoder (209). Thus, the manipulation may be performed on the actual independent audio objects rather than on approximate replicas thereby providing improved performance.