Audio Multi-Issue Deception Testing With Oculomotor Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing deception detection technologies rely on examinees reading written text, limiting their application to those with reading ability and introducing examiner bias and fatigue.

Innovation Solution

An automated audio multi-issue comparison test (AMCT) using eye tracking and audio presentation of statements, allowing for deception detection without reading, with pre-test instructions and high-precision eye tracking to record ocular-motor responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If written text is used to present questions or statements to examinees, then the examinee can comprehend the material, but the application is limited to persons with reading ability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability to examinees with different reading abilitiesVSAvoidcomprehension of test material
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the visual-mechanical system of reading written text with an auditory system by using audio recording to present test questions and statements. This substitution allows examinees without reading ability to comprehend and respond to test material, thereby expanding the applicability of the deception detection system to a broader population while maintaining the integrity of the testing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If examiners manually conduct deception detection testing, then they can provide guidance and support to examinees, but examiner fatigue and bias corrupt the testing process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobjectivity of deception detectionVSAvoidexaminer involvement in testing process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automated testing system where the computerized platform independently presents test questions via audio recording, automatically records oculomotor measures through eye tracking technology, and processes responses without requiring continuous examiner intervention. This self-service approach eliminates examiner fatigue and bias from the testing process, ensuring consistent and objective deception detection across all examinees while maintaining ease of administration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates automated feedback mechanisms where the computer immediately processes examinee responses and records oculomotor data, providing real-time feedback to maintain engagement. The automated feedback loop ensures consistent application of deception detection criteria without being influenced by examiner state, thereby improving reliability while reducing the burden on examiners

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250318765A1Oculomotor based deception detection using audio multi-issue comparison testing
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 CONVERUS INC
  • US20250318765A1 patent drawing
  • US20250318765A1 patent drawing
  • US20250318765A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Automated audio multi-issue comparison test (AMCT) protocols for deception detection. In one exemplary embodiment, testing equipment that may include an eye tracking device, such as an infrared camera, computer, keyboard, mouse, chin rest, and audio output device (headphones or speaker) is used. A series of Agree and Disagree statements regarding issues of interest are presented to the examinee in an audio format as by text-to-speech narration. Each statement must include an introductory phrase, topic phrase and declaration phrase. As statements are presented, a neutral image is presented on a visual display, then replaced by an image prompting the examinee to provide a response when the statement concludes. The eye tracker measures and records eye movements during the test. At the conclusion, ocular-motor measures and test question responses are combined by means of a logistic regression equation to compute the probability of deception.