Audio Comparison Using Peak Time Correlation for Car Radio Retuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Car radio systems face challenges in automatically retuning to channels with similar audio signals without Radio Data System (RDS), due to time shifts, heavy compression, signal distortion, and limited processing power, especially when the signal starts to fade.

Innovation Solution

A method that measures and compares the peak times of audio volume in car radios, using two independently tunable channels to calculate a correlation factor, allowing for robust retuning without a pre-prepared database, and continuously updating the correlation to handle distortion and low processing power.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If audio stream comparison algorithms are used for automatic retuning, then channel identification capability is improved, but processing power requirements and system complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel identification capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential feature needed for comparison - the audio signal itself - and compares this directly against a database of known channel signatures. This extraction approach avoids the need for complex feature analysis while maintaining identification capability, thus resolving the contradiction between identification capability and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-computing and storing channel signatures in a database during initial channel scanning. This allows real-time retuning to simply compare current signals against pre-prepared data, significantly reducing processing requirements during actual retuning operations while maintaining accurate channel identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If complex audio comparison algorithms are implemented, then identification accuracy is improved, but real-time processing capability deteriorates due to limited processing power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidreal-time processing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses simple, computationally inexpensive comparison operations that can be performed rapidly. Instead of employing complex algorithms requiring significant processing power, the system uses straightforward signal matching against database entries, enabling real-time operation on devices with limited processing capability while maintaining sufficient identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If traditional audio correlation systems are used, then signal comparison capability is improved, but robustness against time shifts and distortion deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal comparison capabilityVSAvoidrobustness against time shifts and distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic time alignment by allowing variable time shifts when comparing signals against the database. The system can adjust for different transmission delays and timing variations by flexibly aligning the comparison window, making the correlation process robust against time shifts while maintaining accurate signal comparison capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by adjusting correlation thresholds and time window sizes based on signal conditions. When distortion or fading is detected, the system adapts its comparison parameters to maintain reliability, allowing it to remain robust against environmental variations while preserving signal comparison accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If RDS system is used for retuning, then automatic channel switching is improved, but dependency on additional data transmission infrastructure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic channel switchingVSAvoiddependency on data transmission infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the radio system to perform automatic retuning using only its existing audio reception capabilities. By comparing received audio signals against a database of channel signatures and autonomously identifying matches, the system serves its own retuning needs without requiring external data transmission infrastructure like RDS, thus maintaining ease of operation while reducing infrastructure dependency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8457572B2Audio comparison method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2013.06.04 NXP BV
  • US8457572B2 patent drawing
  • US8457572B2 patent drawing
  • US8457572B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An audio comparison method and apparatus compares audio streams by measuring the times of volume peaks in the audio streams and identifying correlations between the peaks in the audio streams, subject to possible delay between the streams. The audio comparison allows the identification of audio streams including the same audio content even in the presence of delay and distortion and using low processing power. The audio comparison has particular application in car radios to allow automatic retuning.