Audio Signal Prioritization in Conference Focus Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In multi-participant audio conferences, the central distributor in a focus point network faces high computational resource consumption due to processing multiple audio signals, leading to performance inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

The focus device prioritizes audio signals based on criteria such as volume level and duration of speech, limiting the number of signals processed and reducing unnecessary audio processing operations by deeming silent or muted participants' signals as low-priority.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the central distributor processes all received audio signals to generate composite signals for each participant, then the audio quality and completeness are improved, but the computational resource consumption increases substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio qualityVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential audio signals needed for each participant by identifying and removing redundant signals. The focus device determines which remote audio signals to exclude from the composite signal based on what the participant can already hear locally, thereby reducing processing load while maintaining audio quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of processing all possible audio signals, the patent applies partial action by processing only the necessary subset of signals. The focus device selectively processes audio signals based on participant needs, avoiding excessive processing of redundant signals that would consume unnecessary computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Adaptability or versatility

If the central distributor generates and distributes composite audio signals to all participants, then the communication completeness is improved, but the device complexity and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication completenessVSAvoidprocessing overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the audio processing task by creating separate processing paths for local and remote audio signals. The focus device handles local audio separately and selectively combines it with specific remote audio signals, reducing the complexity of generating complete composite signals for all participants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic adaptability by allowing participants to independently control which remote audio signals they receive. The system dynamically adjusts the composite signal composition based on individual participant preferences and local audio availability, reducing processing overhead while maintaining communication completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the focus device processes audio signals from all remote participants, then the audio coverage is improved, but the computational efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio coverageVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary remote audio signals for each participant by identifying and excluding redundant signals. The focus device determines which remote signals to process based on what participants cannot hear locally, thereby improving computational efficiency while maintaining complete audio coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the processing parameters by selectively applying audio processing operations only to necessary signals. The focus device adjusts the composite signal composition dynamically based on participant-specific needs, improving computational efficiency while ensuring complete audio coverage for all participants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8711736B2Audio processing in a multi-participant conference
Publication Date: 2014.04.29 APPLE INC
  • US8711736B2 patent drawing
  • US8711736B2 patent drawing
  • US8711736B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A first computing device distributes audio signals to several computing devices of participants in a communication session. In some embodiments, the first computing device serves as a central distributor for receiving audio signals from other computing devices, compositing the audio signals and distributing the composited audio signals to the other computing devices. The first computing device prioritizes the received audio signals based on a set of criteria and selects several highly prioritized audio signals. The first computing device generates composite audio signals using only the selected audio signals. The first computing device sends each computing device the composited audio signal for the device. In some cases, the first computing device sends a selected audio signal to another computing device without mixing the signal with any other audio signal.