Dynamic Audio Quality Enhancement Activation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current multimedia devices face challenges in managing audio quality enhancement functions, as both hardware and software enhancements can damage voice inputs, and existing methods lack real-time activation/deactivation capabilities, leading to inconveniences and deepened audio quality damage.

Innovation Solution

A method that analyzes microphone input and speaker output signals to determine the need for a software audio quality enhancement function, allowing for real-time activation or deactivation of the software enhancement, thereby avoiding unnecessary damage and optimizing audio quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the software audio quality enhancement function is activated to remove echo and noise, then audio quality is improved, but voice input damage occurs and is deepened when activated multiple times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio qualityVSAvoidvoice input damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic activation and deactivation of the software audio quality enhancement function based on real-time detection of echo and noise levels. The system transitions from a static always-on approach to a dynamic conditional approach, activating the function only when acoustic echo or background noise is detected above threshold levels, thereby preventing unnecessary voice input damage while maintaining audio quality when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the acoustic environment by analyzing microphone input signals and speaker output signals, using feedback from this analysis to determine when to activate or deactivate the audio enhancement function. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures the function is applied only when actually needed, avoiding cumulative voice damage from redundant processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the software audio quality enhancement function is activated to provide noise removal, then noise is reduced, but the complexity of managing audio enhancement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovenoiseVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting the need for audio enhancement through real-time analysis of acoustic conditions and autonomously activating or deactivating the software audio quality enhancement function without requiring manual user intervention or complex external management, thereby reducing management complexity while maintaining noise reduction capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous feedback mechanism from signal analysis automatically triggers activation or deactivation of the enhancement function based on detected acoustic conditions, eliminating the need for complex manual management protocols and reducing system complexity while maintaining effective noise control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If all audio quality enhancement functions are activated to prevent damage, then voice protection is improved, but unnecessary processing occurs and audio quality damage is deepened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoice damageVSAvoidunnecessary processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by activating the audio quality enhancement function only to the extent actually needed based on real-time acoustic condition analysis. Rather than continuously applying full enhancement processing, the system selectively activates the function only when echo or noise thresholds are exceeded, eliminating unnecessary processing energy waste while maintaining adequate voice protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10136235B2Method and system for audio quality enhancement
Publication Date: 2018.11.20 LY CORP
  • US10136235B2 patent drawing
  • US10136235B2 patent drawing
  • US10136235B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a method and system for audio quality enhancement. The audio quality enhancement method may include determining whether a software audio quality enhancement function is desired and/or required by analyzing a microphone input signal that is input to the electronic device and a speaker output signal that is output from the electronic device; and activating or inactivating the software audio quality enhancement function based on a result of determining whether the software audio quality enhancement function is desired and/or required.