ML Audio Quality Detection for Video Conference Troubleshooting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video conferencing systems rely on subjective verbal feedback for audio quality issues, lacking quantitative measures and the ability to track audio quality over time, leading to inefficient troubleshooting and systemic problems.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a machine learning model to measure audio quality, compute a metric for low-quality audio, and generate notifications or corrective actions based on predetermined thresholds, enabling quantitative assessment and systemic issue detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If subjective verbal feedback is used for audio quality assessment, then the system is simple to implement, but the measurement precision and ability to track audio quality over time is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio quality measurementVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/manual system of subjective verbal feedback with an automated machine learning-based audio analysis system. The ML model processes audio streams to generate quantitative quality metrics, eliminating the need for human operators to manually assess and report audio issues, thereby achieving precise automated measurement while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary machine learning model that acts as a mediator between the audio stream and the quality assessment process. This ML intermediary automatically analyzes audio characteristics and generates objective quality metrics, bridging the gap between raw audio data and actionable quality insights without requiring direct human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If manual troubleshooting is performed for audio quality issues, then the troubleshooting process can be performed with simple tools, but the productivity and efficiency of resolving audio issues is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetroubleshooting efficiencyVSAvoidtime for troubleshooting
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring and analyzing audio quality in real-time before issues become critical. The system proactively detects audio quality degradation and generates early warnings, allowing troubleshooting to begin before complete failure occurs, thereby reducing overall resolution time and improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements automated feedback loops where the ML model continuously analyzes audio streams, compares quality metrics against thresholds, and provides real-time feedback on audio quality status. This automated feedback system eliminates delays associated with manual checking and enables rapid identification and resolution of audio issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If audio quality monitoring is implemented continuously, then the reliability of audio quality assessment is improved, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio quality assessment reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by analyzing audio quality at strategically selected intervals rather than continuously processing every audio sample. The ML model periodically assesses audio streams at key moments and uses change detection algorithms to identify significant quality variations, maintaining reliable monitoring while reducing computational energy consumption through interval-based analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20260031097A1Low-quality audio detection
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 ZOOM VIDEO COMM INC
  • US20260031097A1 patent drawing
  • US20260031097A1 patent drawing
  • US20260031097A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for low-quality audio detection are provided. In an example method, a computing system joins a first client device to a first video conference including a number of connected client devices. The computing system receives, from the first client device, a first audio stream. The computing system determines, using a machine learning (“ML”) model, at least one first audio quality measurement based on the first audio stream. The computing system computes a first metric for the first audio stream based on the at least one first audio quality measurement. In response to the first metric satisfying a predetermined threshold, the computing system outputs a message including first information about a first low-quality audio status associated with the first audio stream.