Audio Signal Spectral Damping Without Multi-Band Compression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing audio signal processing techniques face challenges in managing fluctuating signal levels, leading to signal overload, clipping effects, and alteration of wave characteristics due to conventional dynamic range compression methods, which are computationally intensive and introduce artifacts.

Innovation Solution

A method using non-parametric spectral analysis for frequency-dependent damping of dominant frequencies in audio signals, eliminating the need for multi-band filtering and user-defined parameters, with a focus on preserving signal characteristics through automatic, time-varying compression based on spectral density estimation and cepstral smoothing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional dynamic range compression is applied to reduce signal level variations, then signal overload and clipping effects are reduced, but artifacts are introduced and wave characteristics are altered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal integrityVSAvoidartifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies frequency-dependent damping where different frequency components are treated differently. The spectral density estimate is computed and smoothed to identify dominant frequencies, then damping is applied selectively based on the frequency mask derived from the smoothed spectral estimate, rather than uniform compression across all frequencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the damping parameter dynamically based on the spectral characteristics of the signal. The damping factor is computed as the ratio between the smoothed and unsmoothed spectral density estimates, allowing automatic adaptation to the signal's frequency content without fixed user parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If advanced multi-band dynamic range compression with time varying damping is used, then compression effectiveness is improved, but computational complexity becomes significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression effectivenessVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential spectral characteristics needed for compression by computing a smoothed spectral density estimate. Rather than performing full multi-band analysis with filter banks, it uses cepstral smoothing to obtain the necessary frequency-dependent damping information with reduced computational effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a computationally efficient spectral estimation approach that computes the damping factors for each time frame independently using simple spectral smoothing and cepstral analysis, avoiding the need for complex, computationally intensive multi-band filter bank structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of operation

If conventional compression with fixed damping factor and time intervals is applied, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but signal characteristics are altered and artifacts are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidsignal characteristics preservation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-adjustment by automatically computing the damping factors based on the spectral characteristics of the input signal itself. The smoothed spectral density estimate derived from the signal's own frequency content determines the damping application, eliminating the need for manual parameter selection and fixed time intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Adaptability or versatility

If user parameters such as compression ratio, threshold, attack and release times are selected, then compression control is achieved, but parameter selection becomes ambiguous and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression controlVSAvoidparameter selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines all compression parameters from the signal's spectral characteristics. The damping factor for each frequency and time frame is computed as the ratio between smoothed and unsmoothed spectral density estimates, eliminating the need for user-defined thresholds, attack times, release times, or compression ratios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the compression control from fixed user-defined parameters to dynamically computed parameters based on spectral analysis. The damping factors are derived from the ratio of smoothed to unsmoothed spectral density estimates, allowing automatic adaptation to varying signal characteristics without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9065409B2Method and arrangement for processing of audio signals
Publication Date: 2015.06.23 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US9065409B2 patent drawing
  • US9065409B2 patent drawing
  • US9065409B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and arrangement in an audio handling entity, for damping of dominant frequencies in a time segment of an audio signal. A time segment of an audio signal is obtained, and an estimate of the spectral density or “spectrum” of the time segment is derived. An approximation of the estimate is derived by smoothing the estimate, and a frequency mask is derived by inverting the approximation. Frequencies comprised in the audio time segment are then damped based on the frequency mask. The method and arrangement involves no multi-band filtering or selection of attack and release times.