Audio Signal Time Stretching via Steady-Transient Feature Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing audio signal time stretching technologies fail to maintain natural sound quality when expanding or compressing transient sections with fluctuating acoustic characteristics, leading to unnatural sound impressions.

Innovation Solution

An audio processing method that extracts feature quantities from multiple periods of an audio signal, calculates similarity indices, and performs time axis expansion or compression based on these indices and transition costs to match similar sections, while excluding sections with dissimilar fluctuations, thereby generating a second audio signal that maintains auditory naturalness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If uniform time axis expansion/compression is applied to all audio signal sections, then processing simplicity is maintained, but sound quality deteriorates due to unnatural distortion of transient sections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidsound quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The audio signal is divided into multiple periods, and each period is further segmented into steady sections and transient sections based on feature quantity analysis. This segmentation allows different processing strategies to be applied to different sections, resolving the contradiction between processing simplicity and sound quality by automating the differentiation and application of appropriate processing methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different time axis expansion/compression processing is applied to different sections of the audio signal based on their local characteristics. Steady sections undergo uniform expansion/compression while transient sections are processed differently to preserve their natural sound quality. This local quality approach ensures that each section receives the most appropriate processing for its specific characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If transient sections are included in time axis expansion/compression, then complete signal processing is achieved, but unnatural sound impressions are created

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing completenessVSAvoidsound naturalness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Transient sections are identified and extracted from the audio signal through feature quantity analysis. By separating transient sections from steady sections, the invention can apply different processing strategies: steady sections are expanded/compressed while transient sections are excluded or processed differently, thereby maintaining sound naturalness while still achieving complete signal processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The processing approach dynamically adapts to the local characteristics of each audio section. The system automatically adjusts the processing method based on whether a section is steady or transient, using feature quantity analysis to guide the dynamic selection of processing parameters and methods, thus maintaining both completeness and naturalness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If feature quantity analysis is performed for each period to distinguish steady and transient sections, then sound quality is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound qualityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The audio signal itself provides the information needed for processing through its feature quantities. By analyzing features such as pitch, energy, and spectral characteristics that are inherently present in the signal, the system can automatically distinguish steady from transient sections without requiring external intervention or complex manual analysis, thus improving sound quality while managing processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors changes in acoustic parameters (pitch, energy, spectral features) across different periods to identify steady versus transient sections. By detecting parameter stability or fluctuation patterns, the system can automatically determine appropriate processing strategies, improving sound quality through parameter-based differentiation while keeping the processing framework relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10891966B2Audio processing method and audio processing device for expanding or compressing audio signals
Publication Date: 2021.01.12 YAMAHA CORP
  • US10891966B2 patent drawing
  • US10891966B2 patent drawing
  • US10891966B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An audio processing device includes a feature extraction unit and signal generating unit. The feature extraction unit is configured to extract a feature quantity of a first audio signal for each of a plurality of periods. The signal generating unit is configured to for generate a second audio signal by time axis expanding/compressing either a section of the first audio signal in which the feature quantity is steadily maintained for a period time, or a section of the first audio signal in which a fluctuation of the feature quantity is repeated and excluding from the time axis expanding/compressing a section of the first audio signal in which a fluctuation of the feature quantity is not similar to that of other sections of the first audio signal.