Audiovisual Interface Learning User Preferences

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional user interfaces lack the ability to learn from user interactions, leading to frustration and inefficiency in navigating audiovisual content.

Innovation Solution

A method that collects user preferences by analyzing the time spent engaging with audiovisual content and compares this data with metadata streams to provide personalized recommendations and messages, allowing users to perceive these recommendations acoustically, visually, or both, and includes features for parental control and content restriction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional user interfaces are used for navigating audiovisual content, then the interface structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the system cannot learn from user interactions leading to user frustration and inefficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning capabilityVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically learns user preferences by monitoring viewing time and content access patterns without requiring explicit user input. The interface self-updates its understanding of user preferences, eliminating the need for manual preference configuration while maintaining simplicity for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously collects feedback on user interactions with audiovisual content, analyzes viewing patterns, and uses this feedback to refine its recommendations. This creates a closed-loop learning system that improves its adaptability over time while maintaining a simple user interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If user preferences are collected and analyzed to provide personalized recommendations, then user interaction is enhanced and navigation efficiency is improved, but the processing complexity and data management requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-processes and stores metadata about audiovisual content in advance, organizing it by categories, genres, and other relevant attributes. This preliminary organization enables rapid matching and recommendation generation without requiring complex real-time analysis, thus improving navigation efficiency while managing processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a preference learning module as an intermediary between the user and the content library. This module handles the complex tasks of data collection, analysis, and pattern recognition, while presenting simplified recommendations to the user. The intermediary absorbs the processing complexity, leaving the user interface simple and efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system provides multiple output modalities (acoustic, visual, text bubble) for recommendations, then accessibility is improved for users with sensory impairments, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidoutput system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The recommendation system is designed to provide the same information through multiple output modalities (acoustic recommendations, visual highlights, text bubbles) simultaneously or on demand. This multi-functional design ensures accessibility for users with different sensory capabilities without requiring separate systems for each modality, as a single unified system handles all output types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If parental control and content restriction features are implemented, then content appropriateness is ensured, but the interface complexity and control mechanisms increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent appropriatenessVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Parental control settings and content restrictions are configured in advance by parents or guardians. The system pre-establishes these rules and automatically applies them to filter and restrict content access. This preliminary configuration eliminates the need for complex real-time decision-making during content access, maintaining simplicity while ensuring content appropriateness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8566855B2Audiovisual user interface based on learned user preferences
Publication Date: 2013.10.22 SATURN LICENSING LLC
  • US8566855B2 patent drawing
  • US8566855B2 patent drawing
  • US8566855B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for providing an audiovisual user interface based on learned user preferences is described. In one implementation, the method involves collecting a set of user preferences for a user; providing a metadata stream associated with an audiovisual input; comparing elements within the metadata stream with the set of user preferences to form a comparison; and outputting a message to the user if the comparison indicates that the metadata stream matches one or more elements of the set of user preferences. The message may be output either acoustically or visually, and may relate to the audiovisual input, which may be audio, video, or both audio and video. The audiovisual input may be blocked based on a restricted message, and may be accessed upon a successful password query.