Automated Audit Queue Generation for Document Authentication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current auditing systems face inefficiencies due to manual, error-prone operations and inability to optimize audit queues, leading to limited scalability, poor performance, and biased processes, which reduces their capabilities and usability.

Innovation Solution

An automated audit platform that retrieves document batches, generates optimized audit queues with prioritized tasks, and minimizes manual intervention by using a processor to identify audit parameters, calculate document and entity audit requirements, and sort documents into buckets based on authentication requirements, thereby creating a scalable and adaptable audit process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual operations are used to create and manage audit queues, then flexibility in handling diverse audit requirements is maintained, but productivity is reduced and error rates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudit queue generation efficiencyVSAvoidmanual intervention level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically generating audit queues, calculating audit requirements, and sorting documents without human intervention. The processor autonomously executes the entire audit queue management process from receiving parameters to producing the final sorted audit queue, eliminating the need for manual operations while maintaining high productivity and accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operations with an automated electronic processing system. The processor substitutes human operators in performing audit queue generation, document sorting, and requirement calculation tasks, thereby increasing productivity while reducing errors associated with manual work

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional audit queue methods are used, then simplicity of implementation is maintained, but adaptability to different audit scenarios is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudit scenario flexibilityVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by designing a multi-functional processor that can handle various audit scenarios through a single integrated platform. It can process different document types, apply multiple sorting criteria, and adapt to diverse audit requirements all within one system, thereby increasing adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes parameter changes to adapt to different audit scenarios by modifying sorting criteria, document types, and audit requirements as input parameters. This allows the same system structure to handle varied audit situations by simply changing the parameters rather than redesigning the system, thus improving adaptability while maintaining structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive audit coverage is pursued, then audit accuracy is improved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudit coverage accuracyVSAvoidaudit queue completion time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating audit requirements, pre-sorting documents into buckets, and pre-organizing the audit queue before actual audit execution. This advance preparation ensures comprehensive audit coverage is built into the structure from the beginning, allowing accurate audits to be conducted more efficiently without time-consuming adjustments during execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the audit queue into multiple buckets based on different criteria such as document type, priority, or audit requirement. This segmentation allows the system to process and review documents in organized groups, improving audit coverage accuracy through systematic review while reducing overall time consumption by avoiding redundant full-scan operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10614518B1Techniques for audit management
Publication Date: 2020.04.07 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US10614518B1 patent drawing
  • US10614518B1 patent drawing
  • US10614518B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments are generally directed to techniques for audit management, such as for automating and/or streamlining one or more audit processes or procedures, for instance. Some embodiments are particularly directed to generating optimized audit queues and facilitating efficient performance of the audit queues to provide improved audit platforms. For instance, in one or more embodiments, an audit platform may prioritize documents in a batch with identified authentication requirements and/or identified authentication requirements completed by specific associate entities to create an effective worklist, or audit queue, that covers predefined audit targets for the documents and/or associate entities. In various embodiments, the audit platform may present documents in the worklist and/or associated authentication requirements along with one or more tasks or baselines for completion and/or verification via one or more user interfaces.