Auditory Event Detection for Artifact-Reduced Audio Gain Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing audio dynamic range control methods struggle to effectively manage dynamic gain changes without introducing audible artifacts, particularly in complex audio scenarios where multiple auditory events occur simultaneously.

Innovation Solution

The method employs auditory scene analysis to identify and characterize auditory events, using these insights to control key audio dynamics processing parameters such as attack, release, and gain, thereby reducing audible artifacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If dynamic range control is applied to manage audio signal levels, then the audio signal maintains consistent perceived loudness, but audible artifacts are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperceived loudness consistencyVSAvoidaudible artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The audio signal is segmented into multiple frequency bands using a filter bank, allowing independent dynamic range control for each band. This segmentation enables the system to apply gain changes more selectively, reducing the introduction of audible artifacts while maintaining perceived loudness consistency across the full audio spectrum.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the attack and release time constants based on the detected auditory event type. For transient events, shorter attack times are used to preserve transient integrity, while for sustained events, longer release times maintain smooth level transitions. This dynamic parameter adjustment reduces audible artifacts while maintaining loudness consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic gain changes are applied to control audio levels, then the audio signal adapts to varying dynamics, but audible artifacts are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic adaptationVSAvoidaudible artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts processing parameters including attack time, release time, and gain adjustments based on the detected auditory event characteristics. Transient events trigger faster attack responses while sustained events use smoother release characteristics, enabling versatile dynamic adaptation without introducing audible artifacts through inappropriate parameter settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different processing characteristics are applied to different frequency bands and event types. The system identifies specific auditory events and applies localized gain adjustments and parameter settings tailored to each event's characteristics, allowing adaptive processing while maintaining natural sound quality and avoiding generic artifact introduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If auditory event detection is implemented to control processing parameters, then audible artifacts are reduced, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudible artifactsVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The auditory event detection process is segmented into distinct analytical stages: spectral analysis, temporal analysis, and event classification. Each stage processes specific features independently, reducing the overall computational burden while maintaining accurate event detection for artifact reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The auditory event detection system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it identifies event boundaries, classifies event types, and directly controls processing parameters. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require separate processing chains, reducing computational complexity while maintaining the artifact reduction benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12301189B2Audio control using auditory event detection
Publication Date: 2025.05.13 DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORP
  • US12301189B2 patent drawing
  • US12301189B2 patent drawing
  • US12301189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, a method for processing an audio signal in an audio processing apparatus is disclosed. The method includes receiving an audio signal and a parameter, the parameter indicating a location of an auditory event boundary. An audio portion between consecutive auditory event boundaries constitutes an auditory event. The method further includes applying a modification to the audio signal based in part on an occurrence of the auditory event. The parameter may be generated by monitoring a characteristic of the audio signal and identifying a change in the characteristic.