Auditory Event Detection for Natural Dynamic Range Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing audio dynamic range control methods struggle to maintain the integrity of auditory events, leading to unnatural sound processing artifacts, particularly in scenarios where multiple events occur closely in time.

Innovation Solution

The method employs auditory scene analysis to identify and control dynamic gain parameters based on perceived auditory events, using both spectral analysis and a psychoacoustic loudness model to determine event boundaries and modify audio signals accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional dynamic range control processes audio continuously without event detection, then processing is simple and fast, but audible artifacts are introduced and natural integrity is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudible artifactsVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The audio signal is segmented into distinct auditory events based on spectral changes and loudness variations. The processor identifies event boundaries by detecting when spectral profiles or loudness measurements exceed thresholds, creating discrete processing units that maintain natural transitions between events while enabling targeted dynamic range control for each event type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If dynamic range control applies uniform processing to all audio, then processing is simple, but perceived loudness consistency and spectral balance vary across different auditory events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperceived loudness consistencyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different dynamic range control parameters are applied to different auditory event types based on their characteristics. The system classifies events (e.g., speech, music, effects) and applies event-specific processing rules, allowing perceived loudness consistency and spectral balance to be optimized for each event type while maintaining natural transitions between them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If auditory event detection uses both spectral analysis and psychoacoustic loudness modeling, then event identification accuracy improves, but computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent boundary detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system computes spectral profiles and loudness measurements at selected time points and frequency bands rather than continuously across the entire spectrum. By using representative samples and threshold-based event detection, the system achieves accurate event boundary identification while reducing computational energy requirements compared to full-spectrum continuous analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12218642B2Audio control using auditory event detection
Publication Date: 2025.02.04 DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORP
  • US12218642B2 patent drawing
  • US12218642B2 patent drawing
  • US12218642B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, a method for processing an audio signal in an audio processing apparatus is disclosed. The method includes receiving an audio signal and a parameter, the parameter indicating a location of an auditory event boundary. An audio portion between consecutive auditory event boundaries constitutes an auditory event. The method further includes applying a modification to the audio signal based in part on an occurrence of the auditory event. The parameter may be generated by monitoring a characteristic of the audio signal and identifying a change in the characteristic.