Auditory Processing Speed Testing Without Motor Response Bias

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current processing speed tests require memory involvement and motor movement, making them ineffective for certain patients, such as those with multiple sclerosis, and may produce inaccurate results.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system for testing mental speed using auditory stimuli and responses, administered via a speaker and microphone, without requiring motor movement, and allowing for real-time calculation and display of results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current processing speed tests are used, then memory involvement and motor movement are required, but this makes the tests ineffective for patients with motor impairments and may produce inaccurate results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of processing speed measurementVSAvoidrequirement for motor movement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces motor movement requirements with auditory stimulus-response tasks. Instead of requiring physical actions (button presses, eye movements), the system uses audio presentations and audio responses, substituting mechanical interaction with acoustic interaction. This allows patients with motor impairments to complete processing speed tests without requiring functional motor skills.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes the memory and motor components from traditional processing speed tests. By isolating the core cognitive processing element and eliminating confounding factors (memory load, motor execution), the test purelly measures mental processing speed without contamination from other cognitive or physical abilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If auditory stimulus-response method is used, then motor movement requirements are eliminated, but the system complexity increases with multiple tests and instructions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelimination of motor movement requirementVSAvoidnumber of tests and instructions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple test administrations into a single integrated system. The computer-implemented method delivers multiple auditory tests with different instruction sets through a unified interface, automatically managing test sequences, timing, and result aggregation. This merging reduces the operational burden despite the increased number of test components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically presents instructions, administers tests, calculates results, and displays outcomes without requiring manual intervention. The computer-implemented method self-manages the entire testing workflow, from delivering auditory stimuli through the speaker to processing responses via microphone and generating final scores, reducing the complexity burden on operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20260033760A1Auditory system and method for testing human processing speed
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 BENEDICT RALPH HOLMES BORING
  • US20260033760A1 patent drawing
  • US20260033760A1 patent drawing
  • US20260033760A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method of testing processing speed, including presenting a first set of instructions to a subject, administering a first test, based on the first set of instructions, to the subject, presenting a second set of instructions to the subject, administering a second test, based on the second set of instructions, to the subject, calculating results of at least one of the first test and the second test, and displaying the results on a graphic user interface (GUI).