Augmented Reality Point-of-View Synchronization via Controller Cradle

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing augmented reality systems face challenges in accurately synchronizing the point of view of a 3D virtual model with respect to a physical model, particularly in ultrasound visualization training, due to misalignment errors and computational overhead from methods like visual hand tracking and ARuCO markers.

Innovation Solution

A system that determines rotational and positional offsets between a headset and a physical model by combining sensed variable offsets between the headset and a controller with fixed offsets between the controller and the physical model, using a cradle to hold the controller at known positions, without requiring visual hand tracking or ARuCO markers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If visual hand tracking is used for alignment, then hardware requirements are reduced, but alignment precision deteriorates due to small angular errors (2-3°) resulting in large location errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware requirementsVSAvoidalignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a controller as an intermediary device that serves as a stable reference point between the headset and the physical model. The controller is held at fixed and known rotational and positional offsets from the physical model by a cradle, providing a reliable mediation point that eliminates the precision errors inherent in direct visual hand tracking methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the optical-based visual hand tracking system with a mechanical positioning system using a cradle to physically hold the controller at fixed offsets. This mechanical substitution provides stable, known geometric relationships that are far more precise than visual tracking, while the computational overhead is reduced by using simple rigid-body transformation mathematics rather than complex visual processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Extent of automation

If ARuCO marker techniques are used for alignment, then automated calculation of pose offsets is achieved, but computational overhead increases and additional cameras are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated calculationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the complex ARuCO marker detection and computational overhead by replacing it with a simpler mechanical reference system. The controller held in a cradle provides the necessary automated reference without requiring marker detection algorithms, additional cameras, or significant computational resources for pose estimation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using visual markers that require complex detection, the patent creates a physical copy/reference system where the controller in the cradle physically embodies the reference pose. This physical reference copy provides the same automated calculation capability but through simple geometric relationships rather than visual pattern recognition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If Thompson's positioning dock is used for calibration, then sensor calibration is achieved, but it requires a known location of the positioning dock which is not available in this application

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor calibration accuracyVSAvoidapplication adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal calibration system that works regardless of the physical model's location or orientation. By using the controller as an intermediary with fixed offsets from the physical model, the system becomes adaptable to any physical model position, making the calibration process universally applicable rather than location-dependent

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of trying to determine the physical model's position relative to a known reference (as in Thompson's approach), the patent inverts the problem by using the controller as a known reference that is physically connected to the physical model. The fixed offsets from controller to physical model are used to derive the model's position, reversing the calibration logic to work without knowing the model's initial location

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS12422921B2Augmented reality point of view synchronisation system
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 BAIRAMIAN DANIEL
  • US12422921B2 patent drawing
  • US12422921B2 patent drawing
  • US12422921B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An augmented reality point of view synchronisation system has a VR headset having an augmented display and a controller operably interfacing the headset. The system is configured to sense variable relative rotational and positional offsets of the controller with respect to the headset. The system also has a cradle configured to position the controller at fixed relative rotational and positional offsets with respect to a physical model. The system is configured to augment a view of the physical model with a 3D virtual model using the augmented display wherein the point of view of the 3D virtual model is determined according to the variable and fixed relative rotational and positional offsets.