Augmented Driving Scenario Validation for Realistic Sensor Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current simulation methods for autonomous driving systems lack sufficient realism and are resource-intensive, relying heavily on unpredictable real-world data collection.

Innovation Solution

A method for digitally recording and augmenting real-world scenarios to create realistic test data by manipulating selected traffic conditions, analyzing sensor data correlations, and evaluating against reference scenarios to validate the test data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If real recordings from open world driving and test sites are used, then the realism of test data is improved, but the effort and cost of data collection increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverealism of test dataVSAvoiddata collection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates digital copies of real-world scenarios by recording actual driving environments and then digitally manipulating these recordings to generate multiple variant scenarios. This allows realistic test data to be reproduced and transformed without requiring additional real-world data collection efforts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically modifies parameters of recorded scenarios such as weather conditions, lighting, traffic conditions, and sensor characteristics to generate diverse test cases from a single real-world recording, thereby multiplying the utility of collected data without additional field work.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If real recordings are used for testing, then the representativeness of test scenarios is improved, but the control over test parameters is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepresentativeness of test scenariosVSAvoidcontrol over test parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables dynamic adjustment of test parameters by allowing users to modify recorded scenarios post-capture. Test conditions such as weather, lighting, and traffic can be changed on-demand, providing both the realism of real recordings and the flexibility of controlled experimentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent separates the data collection phase from the scenario manipulation phase, allowing independent optimization of each. Real-world recordings capture authentic scenarios, while subsequent digital manipulation enables controlled variation of specific parameters without affecting the core realism of the base scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If simulations are used for testing, then the productivity and cost-effectiveness are improved, but the realism and representativeness of test data deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidrealism of test data
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses real-world recordings as the foundation for simulation, creating digitally manipulated copies that retain the authenticity of actual driving scenarios while enabling efficient repeated testing and parameter variation without additional real-world data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes to recorded scenarios to simulate various conditions (weather, lighting, traffic) that would be difficult or expensive to reproduce in reality, thereby enhancing the versatility and efficiency of simulation-based testing while maintaining realistic baseline data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Quantity of substance

If digitally manipulated test scenarios are created, then the availability of test data is improved, but the validity of the test data needs verification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavailability of test dataVSAvoidvalidity of test data
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a validation mechanism that compares digitally manipulated scenarios against reference scenarios or ground truth data to verify their validity. This feedback loop ensures that while large quantities of test data are generated through digital manipulation, the data maintains sufficient accuracy and representativeness for reliable testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250342289A1Method for validating digitally manipulated (augmented) test scenarios
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 AVL SOFTWARE & FUNCTIONS GMBH
  • US20250342289A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342289A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342289A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for validating digitally manipulated (augmented) test scenarios, comprising the steps of digitally recording a basic scenario with at least one real vehicle travelling on a real track under defined real traffic conditions; digitally recording the basic scenario manipulated by selected traffic conditions to create a reference scenario; manipulating the data of the digitally recorded base scenario by selected traffic conditions to create an extended test scenario; acquiring data of the traffic conditions in the extended test scenario and data in the reference scenario with at least one sensor; analysing the correlation between the test and reference data acquired with the at least one sensor, and evaluating a validity of the data of the test scenario based on a result of the analysing of the correlation. The invention further relates to a corresponding computer-implemented method and preferred uses of the method.