Austenitic-Ferritic Welding Material for Nuclear Cladding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional weld cladding materials used in reactor vessels lack sufficient strength and corrosion resistance for modern nuclear applications, and attempts to enhance strength by increasing carbon content compromise corrosion properties.

Innovation Solution

An austenitic-ferritic stainless steel welding material with a balanced composition of C: ≤0.02, Si: ≤0.45, Mn: 1.60-2.0, P: ≤0.03, S: ≤0.03, Cr: 18.5-25, Ni: 8.5-10.5, Mo: ≤0.75, Co: ≤0.2, Cu: ≤0.75, and N: 0.12-0.3, which interstitially hardens the austenitic phase, promoting high strength and corrosion resistance while minimizing hot cracking through a ferritic phase.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the carbon content is increased to improve the strength of welding cladding, then the tensile strength increases, but the corrosion resistance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidcorrosion resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters by strictly limiting carbon content to ≤0.02 wt%, significantly lower than conventional materials, while optimizing other alloying elements (Ni: 8.5-10.5 wt%, Cr: 18.5-25 wt%, Mo: ≤0.75 wt%, N: 0.12-0.3 wt%) to achieve both high strength and excellent corrosion resistance in the weld cladding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite microstructure consisting of austenitic and ferritic phases in the weld metal, where the austenitic phase provides ductility and corrosion resistance while the ferritic phase contributes to strength, achieving a balance that neither single-phase structure could provide alone

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If conventional weld cladding materials are used, then good corrosion resistance is maintained, but the strength is insufficient to bear the load from auxiliary components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion resistanceVSAvoidtensile strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes alloying element parameters, particularly increasing nickel content to 8.5-10.5 wt% and chromium to 18.5-25 wt%, while controlling carbon at ≤0.02 wt%, to achieve a microstructure and composition that simultaneously provides both high strength (500-700 MPa tensile strength) and excellent corrosion resistance for nuclear reactor applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If nitrogen is used to substitute carbon to improve hot workability, then manufacturing ease increases, but the strength of the weld cladding becomes insufficient for modern nuclear vessels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehot workabilityVSAvoidtensile strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the nitrogen content parameter to a specific range of 0.12-0.3 wt%, which provides sufficient nitrogen for improved hot workability and austenite formation, while combining it with high nickel (8.5-10.5 wt%) and chromium (18.5-25 wt%) content to achieve the required high strength for modern nuclear vessels, overcoming the limitation of previous low-strength nitrogen-substituted materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The welding material achieves tensile strengths of 563-575 MPa, providing high strength and corrosion resistance suitable for nuclear vessels with reduced risk of hot cracking and radiation-induced stress corrosion.

Implementation Method 1

The inventive welding material has been alloyed with nitrogen, which interstitially hardens the austenitic phase of the weld metal and thereby increases the strength of the weld metal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterstitial hardening: Solid Solution Strengthening

Implementation Method 2

a welding material in the form of a stainless steel strip fused on the surface to be coated, by an electrical arc under a layer of molten flux

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectArc heating: Electric Arc

Implementation Method 3

a welding material in the form of a stainless steel strip fused on the surface to be coated, by an electrical arc under a layer of molten flux

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMolten flux protection:

Data Source

PatentUS10807203B2Welding material for weld cladding
Publication Date: 2020.10.20 ESAB SWEDEN AB

AI summary

An austenitic-ferritic stainless steel welding material, comprising in weight %: C: <0.02 Si: <0.45 Mn: 1.60-2.05 P: <0.03 S: <0.03 Cr: 18.5-25 Ni: 8.5-10.5 Mo: <0.75 10 Co: <0.2 Cu: <0.75 N: 0.12-0.3 the balance being Fe and incidental impurities.