Austenitic Stainless Steel Nb Control for Welding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Austenitic stainless steels used in hydrogen equipment face challenges in achieving a balance between strength, ductility, and weldability, particularly due to the effects of high Nb content on weldability and the risk of liquation cracking in weld heat-affected zones.

Innovation Solution

The austenitic stainless steel composition includes specific ranges for elements like C, Si, Mn, Ni, Cr, Mo, Nb, N, and others, with a controlled amount of Nb residues after electrolytic extraction (0.01-0.28 mass%) and optimized solution heat treatment conditions to achieve improved strength, ductility, and weldability, while preventing liquation cracking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If high concentration of Nb is contained to improve strength and hydrogen embrittlement resistance, then strength and hydrogen embrittlement resistance are improved, but weldability decreases and liquation cracking occurs in weld heat-affected zones

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidweldability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the Nb content range (0.05-0.38 wt%) and implementing specific solution heat treatment parameters (temperature and time) to optimize the balance between strength and weldability. The heat treatment parameters are specifically designed to control Nb precipitation behavior, achieving sufficient strength while preventing liquation cracking during welding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating different microstructural zones through controlled Nb precipitation. The solution heat treatment creates a specific microstructure in the base metal with optimized Nb distribution, while the welding process creates a different microstructure in the heat-affected zone. The composition and heat treatment are designed to ensure both zones have appropriate properties for their respective functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If high concentration of Nb is contained to improve strength, then strength is improved, but ductility decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidductility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the Nb content within a specific range (0.05-0.38 wt%) rather than using high concentrations. Additionally, the solution heat treatment parameters (temperature and time) are specifically controlled to achieve optimal Nb precipitation, balancing strength enhancement with ductility preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies composite materials by creating a multi-phase microstructure through controlled Nb precipitation. The steel contains a matrix phase with dispersed Nb precipitates, creating a composite structure at the microscale that provides both strength from the precipitates and ductility from the matrix, achieving a synergistic effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If post weld heat treatment is performed to achieve high tensile strength, then tensile strength above 800 MPa is achieved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by incorporating all necessary strength-enhancing features during the base metal production and solution heat treatment stages. The composition design and heat treatment parameters are optimized in advance to create a microstructure that achieves high strength (≥800 MPa) without requiring additional post-weld heat treatment steps, thereby simplifying the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Strength

If cold working is performed after solution heat treatment to increase strength, then strength of 800 MPa or higher is achieved, but applicability to all structural parts is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidapplicability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by achieving the required strength level (≥800 MPa) through composition design and solution heat treatment alone, before any forming or welding operations. This eliminates the need for subsequent cold working steps, making the material applicable to all structural parts including those that cannot undergo cold working due to geometric constraints or assembly requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed solution enhances the steel's strength, ductility, and weldability, ensuring high tensile strength and elongation while minimizing liquation cracking during welding, making it suitable for hydrogen equipment applications.

Implementation Method 1

Mn is increased to increase the solubility of N, and V and Nb are added to provide solute strengthening due to N

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolute strengthening: Solid Solution Strengthening

Implementation Method 2

V and Nb are added to provide solute strengthening due to N and precipitation strengthening due to nitrides

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation strengthening: Precipitation Hardening

Implementation Method 3

V and Nb are added to provide solute strengthening due to N and precipitation strengthening due to nitrides and cause grains to be finer due to their pinning effect

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGrain boundary pinning: Grain Boundary Strengthening

Implementation Method 4

WO 2012/132992 A1 discloses performing cold working after solution heat treatment and, then, performing heat treatment again

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolution heat treatment: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 5

an amount of Nb analyzed as a residue after electrolytic extraction is 0.01 to 0.28 mass %

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrolysis: Electrolysis

Data Source

PatentEP3358030B1Austenitic stainless steel and method for producing austenitic stainless steel
Publication Date: 2020.10.14 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
  • EP3358030B1 patent drawing
  • EP3358030B1 patent drawing
  • EP3358030B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An austenitic stainless steel with improved strength, ductility and weldability is provided. An austenitic stainless steel has a chemical composition of, in mass %: 0.005 to 0.07 % C; 0.1 to 1.2 % Si; 3.2 to 6.5 % Mn; 9 to 14 % Ni; a total of not less than 0.005 % and less than 3 % of at least one of Cu and Co; 19 to 24 % Cr; 1 to 4 % Mo; 0.05 to 0.4 % Nb; 0.15 to 0.50 % N; up to 0.05 % Al; up to 0.03 % P; up to 0.002 % S; up to 0.02 % O; 0 to 0.5 % V; 0 to 0.5 % Ti; 0 to 0.01 % B; 0 to 0.05 % Ca; 0 to 0.05 % Mg; 0 to 0.5 % REM; and the balance being Fe and impurities, where the amount of Nb analyzed as residues after electrolytic extraction is 0.01 to 0.3 mass %.