Austenitic Steel Sheets High Strength Formability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current steel sheets struggle to achieve a high strength-to-elongation ratio while maintaining formability and fracture resistance, especially under dynamic stressing conditions, and often require high contents of expensive alloying elements.

Innovation Solution

Austenitic iron/carbon/manganese steel sheets with specific chemical compositions and manufacturing processes that include controlled rolling, recrystallization, and annealing to achieve strengths above 900 MPa with elongation at fracture ratios greater than 45000, while minimizing expensive alloying elements and preventing carbide precipitation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If high tensile strength is achieved through alloying and processing, then strength increases, but elongation at fracture decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidelongation at fracture
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling chemical composition parameters (C: 0.2-0.6%, Si: 1.5-3.0%, Mn: 1.5-3.5%, P: 0.01-0.05%, S: 0.005-0.03%, Al: 0.01-0.06%) and processing parameters (hot rolling temperature 850-950°C, coiling temperature 450-550°C, delay time 5-15 seconds) to achieve a balance between strength and elongation. The controlled delay time between rolling and cooling is particularly critical for maintaining both high strength (900-1100 MPa) and high elongation (45-65%).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes phase transitions by controlling the austenite phase stability through specific alloying and thermal processing. The steel maintains an austenitic microstructure through the hot rolling and coiling process, and the controlled delay allows for phase transformation that achieves both high strength and ductility. The phase transition control is evident in the microstructure description showing refined grain structure with appropriate phase distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

2Strength

If expensive alloying elements are increased to improve mechanical properties, then strength and toughness improve, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidalloying element content
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive alloying elements with cheaper alternatives by using optimized combinations of common elements. Instead of relying on costly Ni, Cr, or Ti additions, the patent achieves high strength (900-1100 MPa) and elongation (45-65%) through precise control of C, Si, Mn, P, S, and Al contents, combined with specific hot rolling and coiling parameters. This substitution principle reduces material cost while maintaining or improving mechanical properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter regime from high alloying content to optimized low alloying with precise control. By adjusting the parameters within specific ranges (particularly the delay time between rolling and cooling, and the carbon-silicon-manganese combination), the patent achieves superior mechanical properties without requiring expensive alloying elements, thereby reducing the quantity and cost of alloying substances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If steel composition is optimized for high strength, then strength increases, but formability during cold working decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidformability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by controlling the delay time between hot rolling and cooling (5-15 seconds) and maintaining specific temperature ranges (hot rolling: 850-950°C, coiling: 450-550°C) to achieve an austenitic microstructure with refined grains. This parameter optimization enables the steel to exhibit both high strength (900-1100 MPa) and excellent formability, allowing complex cold working operations without cracking or excessive hardening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite microstructure through controlled alloying and processing, resulting in a refined grain structure with appropriate phase distribution. The combination of specific alloy elements (C, Si, Mn, P, S, Al) in controlled amounts, combined with the thermal processing history, produces a composite-like microstructure that provides both high strength and good formability, enabling the steel to withstand both high loads and complex deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Quantity of substance

If alloying elements are reduced to lower cost, then manufacturing cost decreases, but strength and toughness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealloying element contentVSAvoidstrength
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter regime from low alloying to optimized alloying with precise control. By adjusting the parameters within specific ranges (C: 0.2-0.6%, Si: 1.5-3.0%, Mn: 1.5-3.5%, P: 0.01-0.05%, S: 0.005-0.03%, Al: 0.01-0.06%) and processing parameters (delay time: 5-15 seconds, hot rolling temperature: 850-950°C), the patent achieves high strength (900-1100 MPa) and elongation (45-65%) without requiring excessive alloying content, thereby optimizing both cost and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Manufacturing precision

If steel is designed for high elongation, then ductility improves, but strength decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelongation at fractureVSAvoidtensile strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the delay time between hot rolling and cooling (5-15 seconds) and maintaining specific temperature ranges to achieve an optimized austenitic microstructure. This parameter optimization enables the steel to simultaneously exhibit high strength (900-1100 MPa) and high elongation (45-65%), breaking the traditional trade-off between these two properties through refined grain structure and phase control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in steel sheets with enhanced mechanical properties, including high strength, formability, and toughness under both static and dynamic conditions, without excessive alloying element content, effectively addressing the limitations of existing steel technologies.

Implementation Method 1

the recrystallized fraction of the steel being greater than 75%

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRecrystallization: Annealing

Implementation Method 2

the mean grain size of the steel being less than 18 microns

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS8926772B2Method of producing austenitic iron/carbon/manganese steel sheets having a high strength and excellent toughness and being suitable for cold forming, and sheets thus produced
Publication Date: 2015.01.06 USINOR SA
  • US8926772B2 patent drawing
  • US8926772B2 patent drawing
  • US8926772B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a hot rolled sheet which is made from austenitic iron/carbon/manganese steel and which has a resistance of greater than 900 MPa, whereby: resistance (MPa) x elongation at rupture (%) is greater than 45000. The chemical composition of the inventive sheet comprises the following concentrations expressed as weight: 0.5%=C=0.7%, 17%=Mn=24%, Si=3%, Al=0.05%, S=0.03%, P=0.08%, N=0.1% and, optionally, one or more elements such as Cr=1%, Mo=0.4%, Ni=1%, Ti=0.5%, Nb=0.5%, V=0.5%, Cu=5%, Cu=5%, the rest of the composition comprising iron and impurities resulting from production. According to the invention, the recrystallised fraction of the steel is greater than 75% and the surface fraction of precipitated carbides of the steel is less than 1.5%, the average grain size of the steel being less than 18 micrometers.