Authenticated Component Tracking for Dynamic Maintenance Incentives

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems fail to provide personalized and customized maintenance recommendations for equipment, leading to the use of counterfeit parts, increased downtime, and safety risks, as they lack visibility into the usage of authenticated components and do not incentivize customers to purchase genuine parts or services from OEMs.

Innovation Solution

A computing system that detects and tracks authenticated components and services using unique encrypted codes, generates asset scores based on usage data, predicts maintenance needs, and offers dynamic incentives to encourage the use of genuine parts, thereby improving equipment maintenance and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional systems offer extended warranty programs and maintenance contracts, then after-sales revenue is generated, but the system cannot track usage of authenticated components and enforce their use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveafter-sales revenueVSAvoidvisibility into usage of authenticated components
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements tracking mechanisms that monitor usage of authenticated components and provide feedback to both the OEM and customer. This feedback loop enables the system to verify component usage, generate personalized recommendations, and enforce warranty conditions dynamically, resolving the contradiction between generating revenue and maintaining visibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service through automated tracking and monitoring of authenticated components. The tracking infrastructure automatically captures usage data without manual intervention, and the system autonomously generates maintenance recommendations and enforces warranty conditions, eliminating the need for manual tracking while maintaining comprehensive visibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Quantity of substance

If customers use counterfeit parts to reduce operational costs, then operational costs decrease, but equipment downtime increases and safety risks arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational costsVSAvoidequipment downtime and safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts warranty conditions and incentives based on real-time tracking of component usage. By making warranty benefits conditional on using authenticated components and dynamically updating recommendations based on actual usage data, the system creates flexible economic incentives that adapt to customer behavior, making genuine parts more attractive without rigid fixed terms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters of the warranty program dynamically - including warranty status, incentive levels, and recommendation priorities - based on tracked usage data. This allows the system to respond to customer behavior patterns and adjust parameters to maintain reliability while considering operational cost concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If conventional systems provide fixed-term manufacturer's warranty, then customers have protection during warranty period, but OEMs lose aftermarket sales after warranty expiration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer protectionVSAvoidaftermarket sales
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by tracking component usage and building customer profiles during the warranty period. This accumulated data enables the system to proactively generate personalized maintenance recommendations and offer targeted incentives before warranty expiration, transitioning customers to aftermarket services seamlessly rather than losing them to competitors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous useful action by extending the value proposition beyond warranty expiration. Through ongoing tracking, personalized recommendations, and dynamic incentives, the system keeps engaging customers throughout the equipment lifecycle, transforming the discontinuous warranty model into a continuous value delivery system that sustains aftermarket sales.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20220391916A1System and method to provide data-driven dynamic recommendations during equipment maintenance lifecycle
Publication Date: 2022.12.08 VARIA JINESH NIRAD
  • US20220391916A1 patent drawing
  • US20220391916A1 patent drawing
  • US20220391916A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method to provide data-driven dynamic recommendations for equipment maintenance lifecycles is disclosed. The method includes detecting one or more authenticated components and one or more authenticated services of utility equipment and obtaining usage data, utility parameters, events, and timing of the events. Further, the method includes generating a weight profile and an asset score associated with the utility equipment. Furthermore, the method includes predicting a rate of variation of the asset score by using a variation prediction-based AI model, determining a health condition of the utility equipment, updating dynamic incentives, generating notifications corresponding to the dynamic incentives, and outputting the notifications and the rate of variation on a user interface screen of electronic devices associated with the users.