Transaction-Based Authentication Excluding Fraudulent Merchants

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing transaction-based authentication methods are frustrated by including fraudulent transactions that users do not remember or are confused by, leading to inefficiencies and security risks.

Innovation Solution

A computing device uses a machine learning model to determine a confidence threshold for fraudulent transactions, generating modified merchant choices for authentication questions, excluding potentially fraudulent transactions, and tailoring the questions to improve user accessibility and security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If transaction-based authentication questions include all transactions from user history, then the authentication can be based on real user activity, but fraudulent transactions cause user confusion and reduce authentication reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication reliabilityVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes potentially fraudulent transactions from the authentication question pool. The system identifies transactions with fraudulent confidence scores above a threshold and excludes them from being presented to users, thereby eliminating the source of confusion while maintaining authentication reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses fraud detection algorithms that provide feedback scores indicating the likelihood of each transaction being fraudulent. This feedback mechanism enables the system to dynamically adjust which transactions are included in authentication questions, improving both reliability and user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system uses fraud detection algorithms to identify fraudulent transactions, then security is improved, but the complexity of the authentication system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary fraud detection algorithm layer between the transaction database and the authentication question generator. This intermediary component analyzes transactions and assigns confidence scores, enabling the system to maintain security without requiring complex changes to the core authentication logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the authentication process into distinct components: transaction retrieval, fraud scoring, threshold evaluation, and question generation. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If the system excludes transactions with high fraudulent confidence scores, then user confusion is reduced, but potentially valid transactions may be excluded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidauthentication accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a configurable confidence score threshold parameter that can be adjusted to balance between user experience and authentication accuracy. By changing this parameter, the system can adapt to different security requirements and transaction types, optimizing the exclusion criteria dynamically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260004304A1Excluding fraudulent transactions in transaction based authentication
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US20260004304A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004304A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004304A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatuses are described herein for improving computer authentication processes through excluding fraudulent transactions in transaction-based authentication. A computing device may receive a request for access to an account from a user. The computing device may provide transaction data to a machine learning model. The computing device may receive data indicating a confidence threshold associated with the user from the machine learning model. The computing device may generate a modified set of merchant choices for the user by excluding merchants related to potentially fraudulent transactions within a predetermined time period. An authentication question may be generated, and access to the account may be provided based on a response to the authentication question.