Authentication Key Using 3D Barcode and RFID for Secure Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current multifactor authentication methods, such as 2FA and biometric systems, are vulnerable to hacking and data breaches, particularly when relying on SMS, USB devices, and shared secrets, which can lead to unauthorized access to digital and physical assets.

Innovation Solution

A Unique Identity and Authentication Key (UIAK) system that combines a physical key with a mobile device, using a barcode or RFID tag with three-dimensional elements and machine-readable data, providing a secure authentication process through a smartphone app, eliminating the need for passwords and reducing the risk of data breaches.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional password-based authentication is used, then ease of operation is improved, but security is worsened due to vulnerability to hacking and password leaks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of authenticationVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system is segmented into multiple independent factors (knowledge factor, possession factor, biometric factor) that must all be satisfied simultaneously. This segmentation prevents a single point of failure and requires attackers to compromise multiple separate security layers rather than a single password.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication mechanism uses a composite approach combining multiple authentication factors (password/PIN, physical token, biometric data) into a unified authentication system. This composite structure leverages the strengths of each factor while mitigating their individual weaknesses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If SMS-based 2FA is implemented, then security is improved, but reliability is worsened due to vulnerability to SIM swapping and interception attacks

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidvulnerability to attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A physical authentication token serves as an intermediary device between the user and the authentication server. This token generates and transmits one-time passwords through secure channels (NFC, Bluetooth, USB) rather than relying on SMS, thereby eliminating vulnerabilities associated with cellular network interception and SIM swapping attacks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the SMS-based authentication mechanism with a direct physical connection mechanism using authentication tokens. This substitution eliminates the need for cellular network infrastructure and replaces it with localized secure communication protocols that are resistant to remote interception.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If USB authentication tokens are used, then security is improved, but device complexity is worsened due to requiring additional hardware

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidhardware requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication token is designed with multi-functionality, serving as both a security credential and a portable storage device. It can authenticate across multiple platforms and devices through different connection methods (NFC, Bluetooth, USB), eliminating the need for separate authentication solutions for different devices and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication functionality is merged with a portable physical token that users already carry daily. This combines the authentication mechanism with a familiar object, reducing the perceived complexity by integrating security into an existing part of the user's routine rather than introducing entirely new hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of operation

If biometric authentication is implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but security is worsened due to inability to revoke compromised biometric data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of authenticationVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system segments biometric verification as one factor among multiple required factors, rather than using it as the sole authentication mechanism. This segmentation means that even if biometric data is compromised, the attacker must also compromise the other authentication factors (password, physical token) to gain access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different security characteristics to different authentication factors. Biometric authentication provides convenience for daily use, while the physical token and password provide revocable security layers. This local quality assignment optimizes both ease of operation and security without requiring biometric data to serve all security functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances security by creating an impenetrable lock system, making it difficult to clone the key and preventing viruses from infecting the authentication process, thus protecting digital assets from cyber attacks and unauthorized access.

Implementation Method 1

The authentication item includes an RFID tag with an identification code and authentication information

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRFID (Radio Frequency Identification): Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS10885220B2Secure access to physical and digital assets using authentication key
Publication Date: 2021.01.05 ZORTAG INC
  • US10885220B2 patent drawing
  • US10885220B2 patent drawing
  • US10885220B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Authorized access to a digital asset is obtained by associating an authentication tag with a physical object accessible to a user, by configuring the tag with a first dataset comprised of a random distribution of three-dimensional elements and with a second dataset comprised of machine-readable data elements, and by authorizing a mobile device to scan the elements. The first and second datasets together comprise an authentication key that uniquely identifies the object and, in turn, the user. The authentication key is scanned by a device in response to a prompt from the digital asset to obtain scanned key data. Predetermined key data and a device identifier indicative of the authorized device are stored in a database. Access to the digital asset is allowed when the scanned key data matches the stored predetermined key data, and when the device scanning the data is authorized.