Authentication Timers Using Power-Limited Prover Chips

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing authentication systems face challenges in distinguishing authentic from counterfeit chips during challenge-response protocols, particularly due to differences in power consumption patterns that are difficult to replicate in counterfeit manufacturing.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a power limited power supply to the prover chip, allowing the verifier chip to measure the time interval between the challenge and response messages while ensuring the prover chip's power consumption remains within a predetermined limit, approximating that of an authentic chip.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If power consumption limits are applied to the prover chip, then authentic chips can be differentiated from counterfeit chips, but the authentication system becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A host system acts as an intermediary between the verifier and prover chips. The host controls the power supply to the prover, limiting its power consumption during authentication. This intermediary manages the power constraints without requiring direct modification of the prover chip design, thus improving authentication reliability while minimizing added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the power consumption parameter of the prover chip during authentication by controlling the power supply. The host adjusts power delivery to match expected consumption patterns of authentic chips, creating a measurable distinction between authentic and counterfeit devices without fundamentally altering the chip architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If response time measurement is used for authentication, then counterfeit chips can be identified, but the authentication protocol becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication accuracyVSAvoidprotocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The verifier measures the response time from the prover and compares it against expected time windows for authentic chips. This feedback mechanism provides an additional verification layer that identifies counterfeit chips based on their inability to meet timing requirements, improving authentication accuracy while adding only a single measurement step to the protocol.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If power consumption is limited during authentication, then authentic chips are verified more accurately, but counterfeit chips may fail to respond

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication accuracyVSAvoidauthentication success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The power supply to the prover is limited to a level that is sufficient for authentic chips to complete their authentication calculations but excessive for counterfeit chips to replicate. This partial power provision creates a clear distinction: authentic chips succeed within the power and time constraints, while counterfeit chips fail due to insufficient resources, thereby maintaining high authentication accuracy without unfairly penalizing legitimate devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12323418B2Authentication timers
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 CRYPTOGRAPHY RESEARCH INC
  • US12323418B2 patent drawing
  • US12323418B2 patent drawing
  • US12323418B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A first device transmits a first message to a second device as part of a challenge-response protocol in order to authenticate the second device. A power limited power supply coupled to the second device limits power consumption by the second device during the second device's challenge-response protocol calculations. The first device measures a response time of the second device during the challenge-response protocol. The authentication of the second device is based on the response time of the second device while it has limited power consumption.