Authorization System Silent Release Mechanism
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing access control systems for protected information and functions can be overly restrictive, leading to situations where lack of response is misinterpreted as rejection, preventing necessary releases of information, especially in emergency situations where confirmation is not possible.
Innovation Solution
A method that initiates an authorization process upon detection, allowing for a first release of protected functions or information even without confirmation, with subsequent more comprehensive releases upon confirmation, and includes a protocol for authorized intervention to override authorization processes, ensuring information is accessible when needed.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If strict authorization confirmation is required for releasing protected information, then security is improved, but accessibility in emergency situations deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The protected information is segmented into multiple parts or categories, allowing selective release of different portions based on the authorization outcome. In emergency situations, critical information can be released without full authorization while less sensitive information remains protected, thus balancing security with accessibility.
Solution Approach 2:
The authorization system dynamically adjusts its requirements based on the situation. In normal conditions, strict confirmation is required. In emergency situations detected by the system, the authorization process is adapted to allow release with reduced confirmation requirements, thereby maintaining security while enabling timely access when needed.
2Reliability
If silence is interpreted as rejection in authorization processes, then security is improved, but information release in emergencies deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring authorization rules and thresholds before emergencies occur. These pre-established rules enable the system to automatically determine when silence should be interpreted as permission rather than rejection, allowing immediate information release in emergency situations without time loss.
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements a feedback mechanism that monitors the authorization process and the situation context. When silence is detected, the feedback loop evaluates whether an emergency situation exists based on pre-set criteria, and automatically adjusts the interpretation of silence accordingly, preventing unnecessary delays in critical situations.
3Reliability
If multiple authorization layers are implemented, then security is improved, but system complexity deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The multiple authorization layers are structured in a nested hierarchy where each layer encapsulates specific authorization checks. This nesting allows the system to process authorization requests efficiently by evaluating only the relevant nested layers based on the situation, reducing the perceived complexity while maintaining multiple security layers.
Solution Approach 2:
The system changes parameters such as authorization thresholds, required confirmation levels, and interpretation rules based on the detected situation. In normal conditions, stricter parameters are applied, while in emergencies, parameters are adjusted to facilitate faster access. This dynamic parameter adjustment maintains security through multiple layers without requiring permanently complex system structures.
Data Source
Figure 1~2
Figure 3
AI summary
The present invention relates to a method and system for releasing a protected function, in particular the output of at least one protected piece of information, wherein, in the absence of both an affirmative and a negative feedback within an authorization process, the release of at least one first function, in particular the output of at least one first piece of information, is effected, wherein the at least one first function is independent of the authorization process, in particular the at least one first piece of information includes information independent of the authorization process, and/or the at least one first function includes a protected function, in particular the output of protected information.