Auto-captioning Code Repositories Using Semantic Embeddings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Navigating and maintaining large open-source codebases is challenging due to inadequate documentation and tagging, leading to hidden libraries and difficulties in detecting duplication, trends, and collaborative opportunities.

Innovation Solution

A method for auto-captioning repositories from source code using docstring, code, and dependency embeddings, combined through machine learning algorithms and attention mechanisms, with a neural network generating tags and captions to represent repository content effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual tagging and documentation are used for code repositories, then tagging accuracy may be maintained, but the process becomes time-consuming and scales poorly to large databases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetagging speedVSAvoidtagging accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables code repositories to automatically generate their own tags and captions through machine learning models that analyze the code content, dependencies, and documentation. This self-service approach eliminates manual tagging while maintaining accuracy through automated semantic understanding of the codebase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical tagging processes with automated machine learning systems that use neural networks and transformers to generate tags. This substitution of human effort with intelligent algorithms dramatically increases productivity while preserving tagging quality through advanced pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If comprehensive documentation is added to all libraries, then navigation and understanding improve, but the complexity and maintenance burden of the repository increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation easeVSAvoidrepository complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts essential information from code repositories and condenses it into concise tags and captions. Rather than adding comprehensive documentation, the patent extracts key semantic features and represents them in compact form, improving navigability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms raw code content into standardized vector representations and semantic features. By changing the parameter space from raw code text to compressed semantic vectors, the system improves ease of navigation while managing complexity through dimensionality reduction and standardized representations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the whole database is analyzed to detect duplication and trends, then detection accuracy improves, but the computational time and resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large codebase database into individual repository units, each processed independently by the machine learning models. This segmentation allows for parallel processing and reduces the computational burden of analyzing the entire database at once, while maintaining detection accuracy through consistent application of the same analytical methods across all segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis by generating tags and semantic representations for each repository beforehand. These pre-computed representations are then used for rapid comparison and detection of duplications and trends, avoiding the need to re-analyze entire codebases during each detection operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12039296B2Systems and methods for auto-captioning repositories from source code
Publication Date: 2024.07.16 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
  • US12039296B2 patent drawing
  • US12039296B2 patent drawing
  • US12039296B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for auto-captioning repositories from source code are disclosed. A method for code repository embedding may include a computer program executed by an electronic device: (1) extracting docstring embeddings, code embeddings, and dependency embeddings from scripts in a repository; (2) applying a machine learning algorithm to each of the docstring embeddings, the code embeddings, and the dependency embeddings, wherein outputs of each of the machine learning algorithms comprises a vector; (3) concatenating the vectors into an output embedding vector; (4) weighting the output embedding vector using an attention mechanism, resulting in a repository representation comprising an abstract vector; (5) generating a plurality of tags for the repository representation or the output embedding vector representing the weights of the tags, using a trained neural network; (6) applying a tags-to-caption transformer to the tags or the output embedding vector, resulting in a caption; and (7) outputting the caption.