Auto Changeover Infeed Assembly for Conveyor Lane Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated systems for adjusting lane widths in conveyor systems are complex and lack flexibility, particularly for multilane systems, requiring significant mechanical complexity and downtime for manual adjustments to accommodate changes in article processing.

Innovation Solution

A modular auto changeover assembly featuring a carriage with a latch assembly that travels along a track to capture and reposition guide rail hangers, allowing for precise and automatic adjustment of lane widths using a MECHLOK mechanical locking device, enabling easy conversion between nested and straight pack processing modalities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional clamps or manual adjustment methods are used to adjust guide rail positions, then the lane width can be modified, but significant mechanical complexity and processing downtime are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelane width adjustment capabilityVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The guide rail assembly is segmented into multiple independent guide rails that can be individually adjusted along the conveyor. Each guide rail is mounted on separate support structures, allowing independent positioning without affecting other lanes. This segmentation enables flexible lane width adjustments while reducing the complexity of adjusting the entire system at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The guide rails are designed with dynamic adjustment capabilities through actuated mechanisms that allow automated repositioning during operation. The guide rails can be moved along their support structures using actuators, transforming a static system into a dynamic one that can adapt lane widths automatically without requiring significant mechanical complexity or downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual adjustment methods are used to change packaging line configuration, then lane widths can be modified, but processing line downtime is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging line flexibilityVSAvoidprocessing downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The guide rails are pre-positioned at multiple adjustable locations along their support structures during installation. This preliminary setup allows the system to quickly switch between pre-configured positions without requiring time-consuming adjustments during operation, thereby reducing processing downtime while maintaining flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Actuated mechanisms enable the guide rails to be dynamically repositioned during conveyor operation. This dynamic capability allows the packaging line to switch between different lane widths and configurations without stopping, eliminating processing downtime while maintaining adaptability for different packaging requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Extent of automation

If threaded telescoping elements or rack and pinion systems are used for automated lane guide adjustment, then automation is achieved, but mechanical complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelane guide adjustment automationVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex telescoping and rack-and-pinion mechanisms are extracted and replaced with simpler actuated support structures. The guide rails are mounted on support structures that can be directly actuated by motors or actuators, eliminating the need for intermediate telescoping elements and reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining automation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Traditional mechanical adjustment systems are replaced with alternative actuation methods such as electric motors, actuators, or hydraulic/pneumatic systems. This substitution reduces mechanical complexity by eliminating worn mechanical components like threaded telescoping elements and rack-and-pinion gear systems, while achieving the same automated adjustment function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10351355B2Auto changeover infeed assembly
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 DOUGLAS MACHINE INC
  • US10351355B2 patent drawing
  • US10351355B2 patent drawing
  • US10351355B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus for automatic adjustment of guide rails for guiding articles on a conveyor via lanes is provided. The apparatus includes spaced apart first and second tracks, a carriage for driven travel along the first track, and a guide rail hanger for select slaved travel along the second track by the carriage in furtherance of lane adjustment. The guide rail hanger is operatively linked with a guide rail hanger positioning bar for select reversible affixation with respect thereto in furtherance of establishing a fixed guide rail position relative to the conveyor. A latch assembly, supported by the carriage, has a latch selectively operable for captured carrying of the guide rail hanger along the second track during travel of said carriage, the latch effectuating release of an affixed guide rail hanger from the guide rail hanger positioning bar in furtherance of enabling relocating and re-affixing the guide rail hanger relative to the guide rail hanger positioning bar in advance of captured carrying thereof.