Auto-Contrast Enhancement via HVS Local Difference Histogram Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional contrast enhancement algorithms often result in over-enhancement, noise amplification, and unnatural image appearance due to their inability to distinguish intensity variations in saturated regions, leading to unsuitable enhancement levels and side-effects.

Innovation Solution

An auto-contrast enhancement system utilizing a human visual system-based local difference histogram unit and histogram classifier, which segments intensity values into regions based on sensitivity and applies histogram equalization with side-effect reduction to maintain natural image appearance and suppress noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Illumination intensity

If traditional histogram enhancement is applied to improve contrast, then the overall contrast is improved, but over-enhancement and noise amplification occur in saturated regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage contrastVSAvoidnoise amplification
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the image into different regions based on saturation levels. Saturated regions are identified and separated from non-saturated regions, allowing different enhancement strategies to be applied to each region. This segmentation prevents noise amplification in saturated areas while maintaining contrast improvement in non-saturated areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local contrast enhancement only to non-saturated regions where it is beneficial, while avoiding enhancement in saturated regions where it would cause noise amplification and unnatural appearance. This local quality approach ensures that enhancement is applied selectively based on regional characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Illumination intensity

If contrast enhancement is applied directly to saturated regions, then intensity variation is enhanced, but the image looks unnatural and noise is amplified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintensity variationVSAvoidnatural appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different enhancement qualities to different regions: non-saturated regions receive full contrast enhancement to improve intensity variation, while saturated regions receive limited or no enhancement to preserve natural appearance and avoid noise amplification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent identifies saturated regions before applying contrast enhancement and takes preliminary action to protect them from over-enhancement. By detecting saturation levels in advance, the system prevents the harmful effects of direct contrast enhancement on saturated regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Illumination intensity

If histogram equalization is applied to achieve uniform intensity distribution, then contrast is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintensity distributionVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the histogram processing into two parts: global histogram equalization for overall contrast improvement and local saturation-based adjustment for regional refinement. This segmented approach achieves uniform intensity distribution while keeping computational complexity manageable through efficient implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Illumination intensity

If enhancement level is increased to improve contrast, then contrast improvement is enhanced, but side-effects such as over-enhancement increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrast improvementVSAvoidover-enhancement
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different enhancement levels to different regions based on saturation characteristics. Non-saturated regions receive higher enhancement levels for improved contrast, while saturated regions receive lower or zero enhancement to avoid over-enhancement and its associated side-effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies enhancement selectively only where needed (non-saturated regions) rather than uniformly across the entire image. This partial action approach achieves sufficient contrast improvement without the excessive enhancement that causes side-effects in saturated regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9373162B2Auto-contrast enhancement system
Publication Date: 2016.06.21 HIMAX TECH LTD
  • US9373162B2 patent drawing
  • US9373162B2 patent drawing
  • US9373162B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An auto-contrast enhancement system includes a human visual system (HVS)-based local difference (LD) histogram unit configured to build a LD histogram with respect to intensity values; a histogram classifier configured to categorize histograms of input images based on distribution properties; and a histogram equalization (HE) unit configured to process the input image according to a result of the HVS-based LD histogram unit and the enhancement level determined in the histogram classifier.