Automated Exam Builder for SOP Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Regulated manufacturing companies, particularly in the life sciences, face challenges in ensuring effective employee training and understanding of Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) due to the high volume of training required and frequent changes in SOP, leading to a reliance on manual exam creation and inadequate assurance of employee comprehension.

Innovation Solution

The development of an Automatic Exam Builder (AEB) system that allows Training Managers to select documents and automatically generate exams with sets of questions and answers, utilizing a combination of text parsing, chunking, and large language models to create relevant and effective exam content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual exam creation is used, then exam quality can be maintained, but productivity is reduced and time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexam qualityVSAvoidexam creation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

An automated exam builder system acts as an intermediary between training materials and exam creation. The system parses training documents, extracts key concepts, generates exam questions, and allows manual review/editing. This intermediary process maintains exam quality through human oversight while dramatically increasing productivity through automated content generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The exam creation process is segmented into distinct automated and manual phases. The automated portion handles document parsing, question generation, and initial review. The manual portion handles final quality assurance and editing. This segmentation allows high-speed automated processing while preserving quality control at critical stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If more training staff are hired, then training effectiveness can be improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining effectivenessVSAvoidtraining budget
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The exam builder system enables training departments to self-generate exams without requiring additional specialized staff. The automated system handles document analysis and question creation, allowing existing training personnel to maintain effectiveness while avoiding budget increases for additional hires.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of expert-driven exam creation is replaced with an automated computational system. Large language models and natural language processing algorithms substitute for human experts in the time-consuming tasks of parsing and question generation, maintaining reliability while reducing resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If frequent SOP changes are implemented, then adaptability is improved, but training complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSOP update frequencyVSAvoidtraining management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated exam builder is prepared in advance to handle SOP changes. When SOPs are updated, the system can immediately parse the new documents and generate corresponding exams without requiring manual setup or configuration. This preliminary preparation allows frequent SOP changes to be absorbed without increasing training management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts to changing SOPs by continuously parsing updated documents and regenerating exams. The automated nature of the system allows it to flexibly respond to frequent changes without adding complexity, as the same core process handles both stable and changing content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250124805A1Auto exam builder
Publication Date: 2025.04.17 MASTERCONTROL SOLUTIONS INC
  • US20250124805A1 patent drawing
  • US20250124805A1 patent drawing
  • US20250124805A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system for automatically building an exam displays an automated exam-building interface. The automated exam-building interface comprises a first portion of a user interface configured to display at least a portion of text data and a second portion of the user interface configured to display a question and a proposed answer based upon a selected subset of the text data. The computer system receives a selection of a first subset of the text data. The computer system creates a first task by combining the first subset of the text data with a first request and then provides the first task to a large language model. The computer system receives from the large language model a first question and a first proposed answer. The computer system displays the first question and the first proposed answer within the second portion of the user interface.