Auto-Filter Mechanism for Search Result Refinement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Online search results often produce extensive lists of varying relevance, leading to consumer frustration and reduced transaction probability due to the difficulty in filtering and refining search results effectively.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an auto-filter mechanism that suggests or selects filters based on user selections and analysis of search results, narrowing down the search result set by focusing on attributes, conditions, and relevance, thereby reducing the complexity of the search process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If keyword-based search is used to locate products, then the search can cover a broad range of available items, but the search result list becomes extensive and difficult to navigate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch coverageVSAvoidsearch result list complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the extensive search result list into manageable groups based on common attributes such as price ranges, brands, categories, or other relevant dimensions. This segmentation allows users to navigate through organized subsets rather than overwhelming comprehensive lists, resolving the contradiction between broad search coverage and list manageability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic filtering and sorting mechanisms that adapt to user interactions in real-time. As users apply filters or sort options, the search results dynamically reorganize and refine themselves, maintaining versatility while reducing perceived complexity through adaptive response to user needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Quantity of substance

If extensive search results are displayed to maintain completeness, then all available options are visible, but user decision time increases and transactions are delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of search resultsVSAvoiduser decision time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary filtering and pre-sorting to search results based on common user preferences and purchase criteria before presentation. By pre-organizing results according to likely user needs (such as sorting by popularity, price, or relevance), the system maintains comprehensive option availability while significantly reducing the time users need to evaluate results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables users to quickly change key parameters such as price range, category, brand, or other filtering criteria to rapidly narrow down extensive result sets. This parameter-based filtering allows users to maintain access to comprehensive options while efficiently reducing decision time through systematic elimination of irrelevant results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If users manually apply multiple filters to refine search results, then search precision improves, but the operation becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result relevanceVSAvoidfiltering operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements intelligent recommendation systems that automatically analyze user behavior, search history, and product attributes to suggest and apply relevant filters without requiring manual user action. The system serves itself by autonomously refining search results based on inferred user preferences, thereby maintaining high search precision while eliminating the operational burden of manual filtering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor user interactions with search results and automatically adjust filtering parameters based on this feedback. By observing which results users click, spend time on, or ignore, the system learns and adapts its filtering strategy, improving search relevance over time while keeping the user interface simple and requiring minimal active filtering input from users

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11921802B2Methods, systems, and apparatus for generating search results
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 PAYPAL INC
  • US11921802B2 patent drawing
  • US11921802B2 patent drawing
  • US11921802B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus to constrain a search are described. A selection of one or more items of a search result set by a user may be obtained. One or more attributes of the one or more selected items may be evaluated. One or more filters are identified based on the evaluated attributes.