Auto-ignition Control in Multi-Fuel Engines

Solution Overview

Problem

Dual-fuel engines face issues with auto-ignition of end gases following compression ignition, leading to engine degradation and increased emissions, as the existing methods to control auto-ignition are inadequate, particularly when the substitution ratio of gaseous to liquid fuel is high.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a first fuel system for delivering liquid fuel and a second fuel system for delivering gaseous fuel, controlled by a controller that adjusts the injection timing and ratio of gaseous to liquid fuel based on measured parameters such as auto-ignition detection, to reduce auto-ignition by retarding injection timing and decreasing the gaseous fuel amount when auto-ignition occurs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the substitution ratio of gaseous to liquid fuel is increased, then engine efficiency and power output are improved, but auto-ignition of end gases occurs more frequently leading to engine degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the substitution ratio of gaseous to liquid fuel based on real-time detection of auto-ignition conditions. When auto-ignition is detected, the controller reduces the gaseous fuel substitution ratio to prevent engine degradation, and when auto-ignition is absent, it increases the ratio to optimize power output. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between maintaining high power output and preventing auto-ignition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs sensors to detect parameters associated with auto-ignition (such as cylinder pressure, temperature, or combustion characteristics) and feeds this information back to the controller. The controller uses this feedback to modulate the fuel delivery systems, adjusting the gaseous to liquid fuel ratio in real-time. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to maintain optimal operation while preventing harmful auto-ignition events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If injection timing is retarded to control auto-ignition, then auto-ignition of end gases is reduced, but engine power output decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts injection timing based on real-time auto-ignition detection. When auto-ignition is detected, the controller retards injection timing to prevent end gas auto-ignition. When auto-ignition is absent, the controller advances injection timing to optimize combustion efficiency and power output. This dynamic timing adjustment resolves the contradiction between controlling auto-ignition and maintaining power output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple operating parameters including injection timing and fuel substitution ratio in coordination to control auto-ignition. By adjusting both parameters together rather than relying solely on injection timing, the system can maintain power output while preventing auto-ignition. The controller optimizes the combination of these parameters based on sensor feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the amount of gaseous fuel is decreased to reduce auto-ignition, then auto-ignition of end gases is mitigated, but fuel efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the gaseous to liquid fuel substitution ratio based on real-time auto-ignition detection. When auto-ignition is detected, the controller reduces the gaseous fuel amount to prevent end gas auto-ignition. When auto-ignition is absent, the controller increases the gaseous fuel substitution ratio to optimize fuel efficiency. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction between preventing auto-ignition and maintaining fuel efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses sensor feedback to monitor combustion conditions and adjusts the gaseous fuel delivery accordingly. The controller receives real-time data on cylinder conditions and modulates the gaseous fuel injection to maintain optimal substitution ratio. This feedback mechanism ensures the system achieves both low auto-ignition and high fuel efficiency by continuously optimizing fuel delivery based on actual combustion conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively mitigates auto-ignition of end gases by adjusting fuel injection timing and ratio, thereby reducing engine degradation and emissions, while maintaining engine power by increasing liquid fuel supply when necessary.

Implementation Method 1

The compression of the cylinder ignites the liquid fuel and the gas/air mixture burns from the initiation site created by the liquid fuel combustion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression ignition: Compression

Implementation Method 2

the liquid fuel combustion, forming a flame front that propagates to heat the unburned mixture ahead of the flame front. Under certain conditions where the temperature and pressure of the unburned gases reach an auto-ignition limit, combustion may be initiated before the flame front can initiate combustion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlame front propagation: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS11585262B2Systems and method for controlling auto-ignition
Publication Date: 2023.02.21
  • US11585262B2 patent drawing
  • US11585262B2 patent drawing
  • US11585262B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for maintaining combustion stability in a multi-fuel engine. In one example, a system may include first and second fuel systems to deliver liquid and gaseous fuels, respectively, to at least one cylinder of the engine, and a controller. The controller may be configured to supply the gaseous fuel to the at least one cylinder, inject the liquid fuel to the at least one cylinder to compression ignite the liquid fuel and combust the gaseous fuel in the at least one cylinder, and retard an injection timing of the injection of the liquid fuel based on a measured parameter associated with auto-ignition of end gases subsequent to the compression-ignition of the liquid fuel. In some examples, the controller may further be configured to adjust an amount of the gaseous fuel relative to an amount of the liquid fuel based on the measured parameter.