Automatic Intravenous Injection System with Sensor-Guided Vein Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current intravenous injection methods are inefficient and prone to human error, leading to risks of infection and unsuccessful vein access, particularly in patients requiring frequent or self-administered treatments like hemophiliacs and cancer patients.

Innovation Solution

An automatic intravenous injection system using sensors and motors to precisely identify and penetrate a vein, featuring a needle housing that locks upon entry, with sensors for vein detection and a mechanism to prevent vein rolling, allowing for accurate and safe injections without manual assistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual venipuncture is performed by trained personnel, then injection can be administered, but human error and inconsistency in vein access occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevein access success rateVSAvoiddifficulty of manual injection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables patients to perform their own venipuncture injections automatically without requiring trained personnel. The automated device identifies the vein, positions the needle, and executes the injection, allowing patients like hemophiliacs to self-administer treatments at home reliably.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical skill of needle insertion with an automated system using sensors (optical, infrared, ultrasound) and motorized positioning. This substitution eliminates human error in vein identification and needle placement while maintaining ease of use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If larger needle punctures are used for injection, then medication can be delivered, but risk of infection and sharps injuries increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjection efficiencyVSAvoidinfection risk and sharps injuries
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system uses precision motor control and sensor feedback to guide the needle accurately into the vein on the first attempt, eliminating the need for multiple puncture attempts that increase infection risk and sharps injury potential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs sensors (optical, infrared, ultrasound) to detect vein location and provides real-time feedback for precise needle positioning. This feedback mechanism ensures accurate first-attempt insertion, reducing the need for repeated needle use and associated hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple injection attempts are made for difficult veins, then successful access can be achieved, but time is lost and patient discomfort increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevein access successVSAvoidinjection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary vein identification and mapping using optical, infrared, and ultrasound sensors before needle insertion. This preliminary action allows the system to plan the optimal injection path and execute it in one attempt, eliminating repeated trials and reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated positioning system uses motors and sensors to precisely locate and access difficult veins that would require multiple manual attempts. This mechanical substitution enables successful access in a single standardized motion, significantly reducing injection time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If automated injection system is implemented, then human error is eliminated, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system is divided into functional modules: sensor array for vein detection, motorized positioning system for needle placement, and control system for coordination. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall reliability and reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses multiple sensor types (optical, infrared, ultrasound) that can detect various vein characteristics and conditions. This multi-functionality allows a single device to handle diverse injection scenarios and patient types, improving reliability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system significantly reduces the risk of human error, increases the success rate of vein access, and provides a safe and efficient method for administering medications and blood draws, particularly beneficial for patients requiring frequent intravenous treatments.

Implementation Method 1

The first set of sensors includes at least one of the group consisting of an infrared sensor, an optical sensor, and ultrasound.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared detection: Infrared Radiation

Implementation Method 2

The first set of sensors includes at least one of the group consisting of an infrared sensor, an optical sensor, and ultrasound.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical detection: Light

Implementation Method 3

The first set of sensors includes at least one of the group consisting of an infrared sensor, an optical sensor, and ultrasound.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasound detection: Ultrasound

Implementation Method 4

The second set of sensors includes at least one of the group consisting of a force sensor, an electrochemical impedance sensor.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce detection: Force

Implementation Method 5

the second set of sensors includes first and second electrochemical impedance sensors, wherein detecting entry in the vein includes detecting the presence of a liquid at both the first and second electrochemical impedance sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical impedance detection: Electrical Impedance Tomography

Data Source

PatentUS20220409826A1Systems and Methods for Automatic Intravenous Injections
Publication Date: 2022.12.29 INVICTIS LABS INC
  • US20220409826A1 patent drawing
  • US20220409826A1 patent drawing
  • US20220409826A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for automatic intravenous injection in accordance with embodiments of the invention are illustrated. One embodiment includes a method for automatically injecting a needle into a vein. The method includes steps for identifying an injection position using a first set of one or more sensors, positioning an injection mechanism at the identified injection position, and vertically inserting a needle until entry in a vein is detected using a second set of one or more sensors.