Auto-Injector Single-Spring Mechanism for Complete Dose Delivery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing auto-injectors face challenges such as user discomfort due to high injection forces, hand trembling, and the risk of incomplete doses, particularly in manual devices, while auto-injectors often require multiple springs for needle insertion, retraction, and dose delivery, increasing complexity and cost.

Innovation Solution

An auto-injector design utilizing a single compression spring for both needle insertion and dose delivery, with a simplified mechanism that includes a retraction sleeve and a decoupling system to ensure complete dose delivery and safe needle retraction, featuring a safety button to prevent accidental operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If multiple springs are used for needle insertion, retraction, and dose delivery, then the auto-injector can perform all functions automatically, but the device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic needle insertion, retraction, and dose deliveryVSAvoidnumber of springs and mechanical components
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple spring functions into a single compression spring that performs needle insertion, dose delivery, and retraction through sequential activation. The spring is first compressed to store energy for needle insertion, then automatically repositions to deliver the dose, and finally retracts the needle, eliminating the need for separate springs for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single compression spring is designed to serve multiple functions: it acts as the driving force for needle insertion, then as the piston for dose delivery, and finally as the retraction mechanism. This multi-functional component reduces the overall part count while maintaining automatic operation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If a single compression spring is used for all functions, then device complexity and cost are reduced, but ensuring complete dose delivery and safe retraction becomes more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of springs and mechanical componentsVSAvoidcomplete dose delivery and safe needle retraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic repositioning of the compression spring through a cam mechanism that automatically changes the spring's position and orientation during operation. The spring transitions from a compressed state for insertion to an extended state for dose delivery, then to a retraction phase, with each phase controlled by the cam's geometric profile ensuring reliable function completion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A cam mechanism serves as an intermediary between the compression spring and the injection system components. The cam converts the spring's linear compression motion into the sequential rotational and linear motions required for needle insertion, dose delivery, and retraction, ensuring proper timing and reliability of each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If manual devices are used, then device complexity is low, but user discomfort from high injection forces and hand trembling occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical simplicityVSAvoiduser comfort during injection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The auto-injector performs all injection functions automatically without requiring continuous user input. The user simply activates the device, and the system autonomously handles needle insertion, dose delivery, and needle retraction, eliminating the need for the user to manually apply injection force and reducing hand trembling issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Manufacturing precision

If the button/plunger extension is great to ensure complete dose, then injection completeness is improved, but user convenience deteriorates due to difficulty in reaching and operating the extended button

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplete dose deliveryVSAvoidaccessibility of activation mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual button/plunger activation mechanism with an automatic trigger system. The user activates the device by pressing a trigger, which automatically initiates the complete injection sequence including needle insertion, dose delivery, and needle retraction, eliminating the need for the user to manually extend and operate a long plunger.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design reduces user discomfort, ensures complete dose delivery, and lowers manufacturing costs by using fewer parts, while preventing accidental triggering and ensuring safe needle retraction.

Implementation Method 1

spring means capable of, upon activation: pushing the needle from a covered position inside the housing into an advanced position through the orifice and past the proximal end

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression spring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

a single compression spring arranged to be grounded at a distal end in the housing for advancing the needle and for injecting the dose of medicament

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 3

The content of the ampoule is thereafter expelled by the tension spring forcing a piston forward inside the ampoule

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 4

pushing the needle from a covered position inside the housing into an advanced position through the orifice and past the proximal end

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 5

retracting the syringe with the needle into the covered position after delivering the medicament

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 6

torsion stored in the tension spring is released and the injection needle is automatically retracted back to its original storage position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic Recovery: Elastic Recovery

Data Source

PatentUS12589207B2Auto-injector
Publication Date: 2026.03.31 SANOFI AVENTIS DEUT GMBH
  • US12589207B2 patent drawing
  • US12589207B2 patent drawing
  • US12589207B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An auto-injector for administering a dose of a liquid medicament includes an elongate housing arranged to contain a syringe with a hollow needle and a stopper for sealing the syringe and displacing the medicament, the housing having a distal end and a proximal end with an orifice intended to be applied against an injection site. The syringe is slidably arranged with respect to the housing. A spring capable of, upon activation: pushing the needle from a covered position inside the housing into an advanced position through the orifice and past the proximal end (P), operating the syringe to supply the dose of medicament (M), and retracting the syringe with the needle into the covered position. After delivering the medicament, an activator arranged to lock the spring in a pressurized state prior to manual operation and capable of, upon manual operation, releasing the spring for injection.