Automated Quality Inspection System for Automobile Manufacturing Plants

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current quality inspection methods in automobile manufacturing are inefficient and costly, relying on human visual inspections which are subjective and often detect defects late in the process, failing to capture all relevant quality perception aspects, such as polishing flaws and gloss deviations, and do not ensure uniform quality standards across all manufacturing stages.

Innovation Solution

An integrated quality inspection system with multiple inspection sites across the manufacturing process, utilizing a common database server to correlate inspection data from 3D and surface sensors, enabling automatic decision-making and rework requests to ensure compliance with nominal characteristics, reducing human interaction and detecting flaws early in the process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If visual inspections by human inspectors are employed, then quality perception aspects can be assessed, but inspection results depend on individual training and experience leading to lack of unified standards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality inspection accuracyVSAvoidunified quality standard
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human visual inspection with an automated optical inspection system that uses cameras and image processing algorithms to detect surface defects. This substitution eliminates the variability inherent in human inspection while maintaining the ability to assess quality perception aspects such as polishing flaws and gloss deviations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms subjective visual quality assessment into objective measurable parameters through image analysis. By converting visual inspection into quantifiable data about surface characteristics, the system achieves both precision and reliability in quality assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If inspection is performed later in the manufacturing process, then fewer inspection sites are needed, but repair costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of inspection sitesVSAvoidrepair cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements inspection sites at multiple early stages in the manufacturing process (press shop, body shop, paint shop, assembly shop) to detect defects before they propagate through subsequent processes. This preliminary detection approach enables cheaper repairs at the source rather than costly rework after painting and assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a common database server to correlate inspection data across all manufacturing stages, providing feedback loops that allow early detection of defects and immediate corrective action. This feedback mechanism ensures that quality issues are addressed at the earliest possible stage, minimizing repair costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If 3D measurement systems are used for quality inspection, then dimensional accuracy can be measured, but defects relevant to customer quality perception such as polishing flaws and gloss deviations cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional accuracyVSAvoidsurface defect detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple inspection technologies into an integrated system: 3D shape measurement for dimensional accuracy, optical surface inspection for detecting polishing flaws, and gloss measurement for surface finish quality. This merging of different measurement capabilities allows comprehensive quality assessment covering all aspects relevant to customer perception.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The inspection system is designed with multi-functional inspection sites that can perform various types of measurements (dimensional, surface, optical) using different sensor types. This universal approach ensures that all quality aspects are covered at each manufacturing stage without requiring separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If multiple inspection sites with data correlation are implemented, then quality standards can be uniformly maintained, but system complexity and initial costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniform quality standardVSAvoidintegrated inspection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a common database server as an intermediary that centralizes and correlates inspection data from all manufacturing stages. This intermediary component manages the complexity of data integration while enabling uniform quality standards to be maintained across the entire manufacturing process through systematic data correlation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10875592B2Automobile manufacturing plant and method
Publication Date: 2020.12.29 CARL ZEISS IND METROLOGY LLC
  • US10875592B2 patent drawing
  • US10875592B2 patent drawing
  • US10875592B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automobile manufacturing plant for manufacturing automobiles has a series of manufacturing sites including a part forming shop, a body shop, a paint shop and an assembly shop. Each manufacturing site is associated with a respective inspection site. The respective inspection sites provide inspection data representing at least one of dimensional characteristics, shape characteristics or surface characteristics of the car body parts, the car body, the painted car body and the car-on-wheels produced in the series of manufacturing sites. The inspection data from the plurality of inspection sites is correlated in a common data base server. Inspection sites at a later stage of the manufacturing process can use inspection data from previous stages and automatically decide whether or not a car body part, the car body, the painted car body or the car-on-wheels has to be reworked.