Automated Response Generation for Service Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current online marketplaces for services lack efficiency in matching service buyers with suitable professionals, as they do not consider individual interests or market supply/demand, leading to time-consuming and inefficient processes for both buyers and professionals.

Innovation Solution

A system that automatically generates responses on behalf of service professionals by receiving configuration information and selecting suitable responders based on category, location, and availability, using machine learning models to match requests with interested and capable professionals, thereby streamlining the service procurement process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If requests are transmitted to all service professionals matching category and location, then service buyers can find suitable professionals, but service professionals become inundated with requests and system scalability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice matching accuracyVSAvoidsystem scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating and storing service professional profiles, categories, locations, and availability information before requests arrive. When a request is received, the system quickly matches it against pre-processed data using machine learning models, avoiding the need to query all professionals in real-time. This preliminary preparation enables fast, accurate matching while maintaining system scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary matching layer between service buyers and service professionals. Instead of direct communication between all pairs, the machine learning-based matching system acts as an intermediary that filters and selects appropriate professionals based on multiple criteria including category, location, availability, and predicted interest. This intermediary layer reduces the communication overhead and improves matching accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If simple limiting systems are used to restrict requests to service professionals, then system load is reduced, but service professionals may not receive requests they are interested in and may stop using the marketplace

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem load managementVSAvoidservice professional interest matching
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters used for request distribution by incorporating machine learning predictions of service professional interest, availability, and service buyer-professional match quality. Instead of simple limiting based on request counts, the system dynamically adjusts which professionals receive requests based on multiple parameters including historical behavior, current availability, and predicted engagement likelihood. This maintains system load management while improving interest matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where service professional responses, acceptance rates, and engagement patterns are continuously monitored and fed back into the machine learning models. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from actual outcomes and improve future request routing decisions, ensuring that service professionals receive requests they are likely to accept while maintaining efficient system operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If manual response generation is used by service professionals, then responses can be customized to individual requests, but the process becomes time-intensive and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse customizationVSAvoidresponse generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses copying by creating template-based responses that can be automatically generated and customized for individual requests. Service professional response templates are stored and replicated with specific request details filled in automatically. This allows rapid generation of customized responses without manual composition for each request, significantly reducing response time while maintaining personalization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing service professionals to pre-configure their response templates, pricing structures, and service details once. The system then automatically applies these configurations to incoming requests that match their service criteria, generating customized responses without requiring service professionals to manually create each response. This self-service approach maintains customization while eliminating repetitive manual work.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11575623B2Automatically generating a response on behalf of a first user to a request received from a second user
Publication Date: 2023.02.07 THUMBTACK
  • US11575623B2 patent drawing
  • US11575623B2 patent drawing
  • US11575623B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A server automatically generates a response on behalf of a first user to a request received from a second user. The server receives configuration information for configuring automatic response generation for the first user, including information identifying the first user, information specifying a type of service provided by the first user including a plurality of parameters that define details for the service, and information providing an availability of the first user to provide the specified type of service. A request is received from the second user. The first user is selected from multiple users to respond to the request. A response is automatically generated using at least some of the received configuration information. The response is automatically transmitted to the second user on behalf of the first user.