Auto-rotating Device Airfoil Wing Geometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing man-made samara-like auto-rotating devices have limited efficiency and operational flexibility due to their reliance on simple turbulence-based lift creation and plate-like wings, which restricts their payload capacity and predictability in flight applications.

Innovation Solution

A launchable auto-rotating device with a single-wing configuration featuring two airfoil shapes and a novel wing geometry that generates lift, allowing it to transition from a vertical ascent to auto-rotating flight, with a center of mass placement that can be adjusted to alter flight characteristics, and incorporating a reinforcing spar and optional payload for enhanced performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If simple plate-like wings and turbulence-based lift creation are used, then device complexity is reduced, but lift generation efficiency and payload capacity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewing structure complexityVSAvoidlift generation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the wing by implementing an airfoil cross-section with specific curvature characteristics instead of a simple plate-like structure. This parameter change enables more efficient lift generation while maintaining relative structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies curvature to the wing cross-section by designing an airfoil shape with a rounded leading edge and a curved upper surface, replacing the flat plate-like structure. This curvature enables better airflow attachment and higher lift coefficients

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Ease of manufacture

If simple plate-like wings are used, then manufacturing ease is improved, but flight predictability and operational flexibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewing manufacturing easeVSAvoidflight predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the wing geometry parameters to include a cambered airfoil section with defined thickness distribution and camber line. These parameter changes improve flight predictability through more consistent aerodynamic behavior while remaining manufacturable using standard fabrication processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If turbulence-based lift creation is used, then device complexity is reduced, but payload capacity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelift mechanism complexityVSAvoidpayload capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the lift generation mechanism by optimizing the airfoil section parameters including thickness-to-chord ratio, camber distribution, and leading edge radius. These parameter optimizations enable higher lift coefficients that can support greater payload masses without adding complex mechanical lift-generation systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device achieves a high glide ratio and efficient lift generation, enabling longer travel distances and increased payload capacity while maintaining predictability and operational flexibility in flight.

Implementation Method 1

The structure of the device, particularly the novel arrangement of airfoils and design of the wing, generates lift that slows its descent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

the shape of the wing causes the airflow around the samara (as it drops through the air) to induce a spinning motion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAirflow-induced pressure difference: Bernoulli Effect

Implementation Method 3

When a maple seed falls from the tree on which it developed, it picks up speed and starts to rotate around its center of mass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAuto-rotation: Angular Momentum

Implementation Method 4

The maple seed is described as 'auto-rotating' because its spinning helicopter-like motion arises automatically as it falls through the air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitational force: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS9199718B2Auto-rotating device
Publication Date: 2015.12.01 FOGARTY SHAUN P
  • US9199718B2 patent drawing
  • US9199718B2 patent drawing
  • US9199718B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A launchable device capable of autorotating flight. The device comprises a wing with two airfoils that induce this autorotating flight after launch and ascent.