Auto Tip Calibration in Extrusion Apparatus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing three-dimensional modeling machines require manual and time-consuming calibration of extrusion tips, which can be unreliable and difficult for inexperienced users, leading to inaccuracies and failures in model construction.

Innovation Solution

An automatic calibration method that generates a material build profile, determines its relative position, compares it to an expected profile, and adjusts the deposition device to achieve precise positioning of extrusion tips in the X, Y, and Z directions, eliminating the need for operator intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual calibration method is used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and manufacturing precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration procedure complexityVSAvoidextrusion tip positioning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration system performs self-calibration automatically without requiring manual intervention. The controller executes calibration routines that autonomously determine tip-to-substrate offsets, tip-to-tip offsets, and other positioning parameters by analyzing deposited material profiles and sensor feedback, thereby achieving high precision without increasing operational complexity for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical measurement and adjustment methods with automated computational algorithms and sensor-based detection. The system uses digital image processing, sensor feedback, and controller calculations to determine calibration parameters, substituting the need for manual calipers, rulers, and visual estimation with automated electronic measurement systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If automatic calibration method is implemented, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextrusion tip positioning accuracyVSAvoidcalibration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration system is integrated into the existing extrusion apparatus architecture, utilizing the same controller, sensor system, and material deposition mechanisms for both manufacturing and calibration functions. This multi-functionality approach allows the system to perform calibration without adding separate dedicated hardware, thereby improving precision while minimizing the increase in overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs calibration routines automatically before or during the manufacturing process, establishing accurate tip positioning parameters in advance. By conducting calibration as a preliminary or concurrent operation rather than a separate post-processing step, the system achieves high precision positioning without requiring complex additional calibration equipment or procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If manual calibration is performed, then ease of operation is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser accessibility for calibrationVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration system automatically performs all calibration measurements and adjustments without requiring user intervention. The controller executes calibration routines that autonomously analyze deposited material profiles, calculate offset values, and update positioning parameters, thereby reducing calibration time while maintaining ease of operation through automated execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The calibration process is integrated into the continuous operation of the extrusion system, allowing calibration to be performed during idle periods, between prints, or as part of the normal manufacturing cycle. This continuous integration eliminates downtime dedicated to separate calibration operations, improving productivity while keeping the system accessible and easy to operate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Loss of time

If manual calibration is used, then loss of time is reduced, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration durationVSAvoidcalibration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual estimation and physical measurement with automated optical sensors, digital image processing, and computational algorithms. This substitution eliminates human error, ensures consistent and repeatable measurements, and achieves higher reliability in calibration accuracy while maintaining or reducing calibration time through automated execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The calibration system incorporates sensor feedback loops that continuously monitor the deposited material profiles and adjust calibration parameters accordingly. By analyzing actual material deposition characteristics and using this feedback to refine positioning parameters, the system achieves reliable and accurate calibration results while completing the process efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7680555B2Auto tip calibration in an extrusion apparatus
Publication Date: 2010.03.16 STRATASYS INC
  • US7680555B2 patent drawing
  • US7680555B2 patent drawing
  • US7680555B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is a method for performing a calibration routine of a deposition device in a three-dimensional modeling machine that deposits a material to build up three-dimensional objects as directed by a controller on a substrate mounted on a platform. The method comprises generating a material build profile, which represents a three-dimensional structure at defined locations. A relative position of the material build profile is then determined. An expected build profile is identified and then compared to the determined relative position of the material build profile to identify any difference which represents an offset. The modeling system then positions the deposition device based upon the offset.