Autodiscovery Dynamic Configuration Launching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional monitoring methods in dynamic container architectures are static and fail to adapt to changes in infrastructure, such as shifting IP addresses, making it difficult to manage and configure monitoring systems effectively.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of autodiscovery monitoring with a common event bus that translates system events into a common format, allowing providers to automatically launch configurations based on detected conditions, enabling dynamic configuration and adaptation to changes in the infrastructure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional static monitoring methods are used in dynamic container architectures, then configuration management is simplified, but the system cannot adapt to changes in infrastructure such as shifting IP addresses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to infrastructure changesVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system transitions from static configuration to dynamic autodiscovery. Providers continuously monitor system events and automatically detect changes in infrastructure (such as new containers, IP address changes). When changes are detected, the system dynamically generates and launches appropriate monitoring configurations without manual intervention, enabling adaptation to dynamic container architectures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service through automated configuration generation and launching. When providers detect system events or infrastructure changes, they automatically create monitoring configurations and launch them without requiring user intervention. This self-service mechanism enables the system to adapt to changes autonomously while managing complexity internally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If manual configuration of monitoring services is performed for each new host, then configuration accuracy is ensured, but time consumption and operational overhead increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration deployment speedVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Configuration templates are prepared in advance with predefined monitoring parameters and settings. When a provider detects a system event (such as a new container or service), it automatically instantiates the appropriate template and launches the configuration. This preliminary preparation enables rapid deployment while maintaining configuration accuracy through template validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses configuration templates that can be copied and instantiated multiple times based on detected events. Instead of manually creating unique configurations for each host, the system copies proven templates and adapts them to specific instances through parameter substitution. This approach maintains operational simplicity while enabling rapid scaling across multiple hosts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If static configuration methods are used, then system stability is maintained, but the system cannot respond to dynamic changes in container deployments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to dynamic changesVSAvoidmonitoring reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Providers continuously monitor system events and provide feedback about infrastructure changes to the configuration management system. This feedback loop enables the system to detect changes (such as new containers, IP address assignments, or service deployments) and automatically respond by generating and launching appropriate monitoring configurations. The feedback mechanism ensures reliable adaptation to dynamic changes while maintaining system stability through controlled response processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11424984B2Autodiscovery with dynamic configuration launching
Publication Date: 2022.08.23 ELASTICSEARCH BV
  • US11424984B2 patent drawing
  • US11424984B2 patent drawing
  • US11424984B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for autodiscovery with dynamic configuration are provided. Exemplary methods include: generating a configuration template for a provider, the configuration template including one or more conditions; monitoring for launch of a new event from a provider; based on the monitoring, detecting the new event; determining, for the detected new event, occurrence of at least one condition of the configuration template; and in response to the determining, automatically launching a configuration associated with the new event. New events may be emitted to a common bus by various providers. The provider may be a container-based provider, container orchestration platform, port-based provider, process-based provider, file search provider, or the like. For container providers, an automatically launched configuration can be automatically stopped once the container exits. The method may include determining that a detected new container includes one or more hints for determining a particular configuration to automatically launch.