Autoencoder Fragrance Composition Generation With Viability Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems struggle to generate new fragrance or flavor compositions efficiently, especially with a large number of ingredients, and fail to consider the non-linear interactions between ingredients and solvents, leading to compositions that are not viable or require extensive post-processing.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for training autoencoder or generative adversarial neural networks using exemplar fragrance or flavor composition digital identifiers, incorporating hedonic, sensorial, and physicochemical parameters to generate indeterministic and realistic digital representations of new compositions, allowing for automatic generation under specific constraints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If statistical optimization techniques are used to generate ingredient compositions, then the method is simple and easy to implement, but it is limited to very simple cases with fewer than a hundred ingredients maximum

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemethod complexityVSAvoidingredient dimension capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional statistical optimization techniques with neural network-based machine learning systems. The neural network learns complex patterns and relationships in ingredient compositions through training on large datasets, enabling it to handle high-dimensional ingredient spaces (thousands of ingredients) that statistical methods cannot manage. The network architecture includes embedding layers that transform ingredient identifiers into continuous vector representations, allowing efficient processing of large ingredient dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If IBM philyra system is used to create meaningful embedding space, then ingredient similarity can be learned in larger ingredient dimension space, but only few percent of generated compositions are deemed as interesting starting points by experts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveingredient dimension capacityVSAvoidcomposition quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where expert evaluations of generated compositions are used to refine and retrain the neural network. The system learns from expert feedback to improve the quality and interestingness of generated compositions over time. This iterative feedback loop allows the system to progressively enhance composition quality while maintaining the ability to handle large ingredient dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs multiple neural network architectures with different parameters and configurations (autoencoders, GANs, VAEs) to generate compositions. By adjusting network parameters, latent space dimensions, and generation constraints, the system can optimize for different quality metrics while maintaining scalability to large ingredient spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If random forest neural network device is used as generative tool, then pruning or cropping effects can be obtained on compositions, but the system is unable to generate new compositions in an indeterministic manner

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomposition controlVSAvoidgenerative capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses dynamic generative models (GANs, VAEs) that can adaptively generate new compositions based on learned patterns rather than fixed rules. The neural networks maintain control through learned constraints and objectives while generating indeterministic new compositions. The system dynamically adjusts generation parameters and explores the composition space creatively while respecting formulation constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If deep belief neural networks are used as generative tool, then the system can explore entire space to provide solutions, but high amounts of postprocessing are required to filter out viable solutions and the system is deterministic after training

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution exploration capabilityVSAvoidpostprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates constraint satisfaction and viability filtering directly into the neural network training process and generation architecture. The networks are trained to inherently produce viable compositions by learning from valid example compositions and incorporating domain knowledge constraints. This preliminary action during training eliminates the need for extensive postprocessing filtering, as the generated compositions are already more likely to be viable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

5Measurement precision

If machine learning technologies are used to predict olfactive properties of individual molecules, then unitary molecule olfactory property prediction is achieved, but the system cannot be used for ingredient composition generation and does not account for composition effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveolfactory property prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomposition generation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges individual ingredient olfactory property predictions with composition-level analysis. The neural network models learn not only individual ingredient characteristics but also how ingredients interact and combine to produce overall composition effects. The system integrates unitary molecule properties with emergent composition properties, accounting for non-linear interactions between ingredients and solvents in the composition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP4016534B1Computer-implemented methods for training a neural network device and corresponding methods for generating a fragrance or flavor compositions
Publication Date: 2025.10.08 FIRMENICH SA
  • EP4016534B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4016534B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4016534B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The computer-implemented method (100) for training an autoencoder neural network or generative adversarial network device to generate indeterministic and realistic digital representations of new fragrance or flavor ingredient compositions to be compounded, comprises the steps of: - providing (105) an original set of exemplar fragrance or flavor composition digital identifiers, said exemplar fragrance or flavor composition digital identifiers being representative of materialized fragrance or flavor compositions comprising at least two distinct ingredients and - training (110) an autoencoder device or generative adversarial network device using the original set of exemplar fragrance or flavor composition digital identifiers to generate a fragrance or flavor composition generative model trained to generate new fragrance or flavor ingredient compositions, comprising at least two distinct ingredients, to be compounded. The trained autoencoder device or generative adversarial network device can be used to generate new fragrance or flavor ingredient compositions.