Autoencoder MLIP Architecture for Scalable Hamiltonian Energy Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) face challenges in scaling to large atomic systems while accurately accounting for both short-range and long-range effects, and capturing discontinuities and transitions, leading to computational inefficiencies and inaccuracies in simulations.

Innovation Solution

The use of an autoencoder with a restricted latent space to learn auxiliary properties of an atomic system, combined with a machine learning model, enables scalable and precise determination of total energy by discretizing states and incorporating both short-range and long-range effects, while handling discontinuities and transitions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional machine learning models are used for interatomic potentials, then short-range effects can be captured, but scalability to large atomic systems deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of short-range effectsVSAvoidscalability to large systems
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The total energy is segmented into short-range contributions (captured by MLIP) and long-range contributions (captured by Hamiltonian). This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently - MLIP for accuracy in short-range interactions and Hamiltonian for scalability in large systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An autoencoder with restricted latent space serves as an intermediary to learn discrete auxiliary states that bridge the short-range MLIP and long-range Hamiltonian components. These discrete states enable the Hamiltonian to capture long-range effects efficiently while maintaining overall system accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If continuous latent space is used in autoencoder, then flexibility is improved, but computational efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility of latent spaceVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The latent space parameter is changed from continuous to discrete by restricting its dimension. This transformation maintains the autoencoder's ability to learn meaningful representations while enabling efficient computation of long-range Hamiltonian effects, as discrete states can be processed more efficiently than continuous values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If ab-initio methods are used, then accuracy is improved, but computational cost deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of energy determinationVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The computational problem is segmented into short-range (handled by efficient MLIP) and long-range (handled by scalable Hamiltonian) components. This avoids the need for computationally expensive ab-initio methods while maintaining accuracy through the complementary strengths of both segmentation approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The energy determination method is composite, combining MLIP and Hamiltonian approaches. Each component contributes its strengths - MLIP provides accurate short-range interactions with low computational cost, while Hamiltonian provides efficient long-range handling, together achieving ab-initio level accuracy without the computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Productivity

If discrete states are used in autoencoder output, then scalability is improved, but ability to capture continuous transitions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescalability of simulationVSAvoidhandling of continuous transitions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically transitions between discrete states learned by the autoencoder. While the states themselves are discrete, the framework accommodates transitions between them, enabling the representation of continuous physical processes through sequences of discrete states, thus maintaining both scalability and transition accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260057143A1Autoencoder-based machine-learned interatomic potentials for scalable, augmented hamiltonians
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20260057143A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057143A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057143A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for a machine learning network that train and subsequently execute both an autoencoder and a machine learning model within a context of machine-learning interatomic potentials are disclosed. The system described herein is configured to embed atomic positions and species of a given atomic system and apply those to an autoencoder in order to learn an auxiliary property and to a machine learning model in order to learn local energies. The auxiliary property is then used to generate an auxiliary Hamiltonian description. By combining both the auxiliary Hamiltonian description and the local energies, properties such as total energy of the atomic system are determined. By processing the machine learning through both an autoencoder and a machine learning model, such methods ensure that long and short range effects are accounted for, while also appropriately enabling for realistic discontinuities and/or transitions within the potential energy surface.