Autoencoder MRI Reconstruction with Multi-Contrast Input
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current MRI image reconstruction methods lack the utilization of multi-contrast MRI image-related information, leading to suboptimal reconstruction quality and reliability of diagnostic results.
Innovation Solution
A medical system utilizing an autoencoder neural network that takes a reference MRI image and a style MRI image as input to produce a target MRI image with improved anatomical structure matching, while also reconstructing clinical MRI images through iterative k-space data processing.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Device complexity
If single-contrast MRI images are used for reconstruction, then the reconstruction process is simpler, but the reconstruction quality and diagnostic reliability deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent combines multiple contrast MRI images (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, FLAIR) into a unified reconstruction framework. The neural network simultaneously processes multiple contrast images as input channels, merging the information from different contrasts to produce a single high-quality reconstructed image, thereby resolving the contradiction between simplicity and quality.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses a composite approach by integrating multiple types of MRI contrast information (different weighting images) into a single reconstruction model. This composite input structure allows the network to leverage complementary information from various contrasts, improving reconstruction quality without significantly increasing operational complexity.
2Manufacturing precision
If multi-contrast MRI images are utilized for reconstruction, then the reconstruction quality and diagnostic reliability improve, but the processing complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements a universal neural network architecture that can handle multiple contrast types through a single model. The network is designed with multi-channel input capability that universally processes different MRI contrasts (T1, T2, FLAIR) using the same computational framework, avoiding the need for separate processing pipelines for each contrast type.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent performs preliminary alignment and normalization of multiple contrast images before they enter the neural network. This preprocessing step ensures that the multi-contrast inputs are properly registered and scaled, reducing the computational burden during the main reconstruction process and mitigating the increase in processing complexity.
3Use of energy by moving object
If traditional reconstruction methods are used, then the computational resources required are lower, but image artifacts increase and diagnostic reliability decreases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces traditional mechanical/image-processing reconstruction algorithms with a neural network-based approach. This substitution uses learned patterns from training data to reconstruct images, replacing conventional iterative mathematical methods with a data-driven model that reduces artifacts while maintaining reasonable computational efficiency.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the reconstruction process by using a trained neural network model with fixed weights and biases. Once trained, the network processes images through a fixed computational graph with optimized parameters, achieving high diagnostic reliability without requiring extensive computational resources during inference.
4Manufacturing precision
If deep learning models are implemented for multi-contrast reconstruction, then reconstruction quality improves, but the model complexity and training requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the reconstruction task into distinct functional components within the neural network: an encoder that extracts features from multiple contrast inputs, a decoder that reconstructs the image, and skip connections that preserve spatial information. This segmentation of the model architecture makes the complex deep learning approach more manageable and efficient.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces skip connections as intermediary pathways that directly transmit feature maps from encoder layers to corresponding decoder layers. These intermediaries preserve important spatial and contextual information that would otherwise be lost in the encoding-decoding process, enabling high-quality reconstruction without requiring excessively deep or complex network architectures.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The proposed solution enhances MRI image reconstruction quality by effectively incorporating multi-contrast information, thereby improving the reliability of diagnostic results and reducing image artifacts.
Implementation Method 1
an autoencoder neural network that takes a reference MRI image and a style MRI image as input to produce a target MRI image
Implementation Method 2
calculate the target k-space data by Fourier transforming the target magnetic resonance image
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
Disclosed is magnetic resonance imaging method using an autoencoder neural network (114, 500, 702, 800, 900) configured to output a target magnetic resonance image (124) in response to receiving a reference magnetic resonance image (116) and a style magnetic resonance image (122). The method comprises: receiving (200) the reference magnetic resonance image, receiving (202) measured k-space data (118), reconstructing (204) a measured magnetic resonance image (120) as the style magnetic resonance image. The method further comprises performing the following iteratively: receiving (208) the target magnetic resonance image, calculating (210) target k-space data (126), generating (212) intermediate k-space data (128) from the measured k-space data and the target k-space data, and reconstructing (214) an intermediate magnetic resonance image (130) as the style magnetic resonance image for the iterative loop. The method further comprises providing (218) the intermediate magnetic resonance image upon termination (132, 410, 414) of the iterative loop.