Autoencoder Workpiece Quality Control for High-Frequency Machining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current workpiece quality control methods require domain expert knowledge for signal preprocessing and threshold setting, which is inefficient and labor-intensive, especially in high-frequency machining processes.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using autoencoders, specifically variational autoencoders, to transform high-frequency machining datasets into time-frequency domains, reducing the need for expert input by training a function that analyzes workpiece quality based on statistical distributions, thereby minimizing false alarms and miss-detections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional threshold-based quality control methods are used, then domain expert knowledge can be applied to set acceptable signal ranges, but the system requires extensive expert presence and complex data preprocessing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality control accuracyVSAvoiddata preprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autoencoder model performs self-service by automatically learning the optimal preprocessing transformations and quality thresholds from training data, eliminating the need for manual expert intervention in signal filtering and threshold setting. The model autonomously identifies patterns and deviations in high-frequency machining signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual expert-based preprocessing and threshold setting is replaced with an automated neural network model. The autoencoder substitutes the mechanical process of expert analysis with an intelligent system that learns optimal preprocessing parameters and quality criteria through training on labeled datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If manual expert analysis is used for signal preprocessing, then quality thresholds can be accurately determined, but the process becomes labor-intensive and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality threshold accuracyVSAvoidquality control efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves both precision and productivity through self-service automation. The autoencoder model automatically determines quality thresholds with high accuracy while processing signals in real-time without manual intervention, thereby improving both measurement precision and operational efficiency simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The model performs preliminary learning during the training phase on historical quality data, preparing the autoencoder to automatically and accurately process future machining signals in real-time production, thereby achieving both precision and efficiency without repeated manual analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If high-frequency machining data is collected at extremely fine scales, then detailed workpiece quality information can be captured, but the data volume and processing requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality information completenessVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The autoencoder extracts only the essential quality-related features from the high-volume high-frequency data, separating relevant quality information from redundant data. The model extracts meaningful patterns while discarding unnecessary information, maintaining quality assessment accuracy with reduced processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of processing all raw high-frequency data, the model creates a compressed representation or copy of the essential quality features in the hidden layer. This copied representation contains the critical quality information needed for assessment without requiring processing of the complete high-volume original dataset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12078982B2Methods and systems for workpiece quality control
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 SIEMENS AG
  • US12078982B2 patent drawing
  • US12078982B2 patent drawing
  • US12078982B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for providing a trained function for performing a workpiece quality control includes receiving a plurality of training machining datasets, wherein different training high-frequency machining datasets are representative for the quality of different workpieces, transforming the plurality of training machining datasets into the time-frequency domain to generate a plurality of training time-frequency domain datasets, and training a function based on the plurality of training time-frequency domain datasets, wherein the function is based on an autoencoder. The autoencoder has input layers, output layers and a hidden layer. The plurality of training time-frequency domain datasets are provided to the input layers and the output layers during training, and a trained autoencoder function is outputted.