Autofocus Pixel Selection for Contrast Measurement Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing contrast-based autofocus methods for image capture devices are limited in accuracy and efficiency, as they rely on fixed pixel values and do not adapt well to varying lighting conditions or image zones with different characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A method that dynamically selects a subset of pixel values based on intensity and reliability to generate contrast data, using band-pass filtering and normalization techniques to determine an optimal focus setting for image capture devices, which involves obtaining and processing focus metrics from multiple images with different settings and performing a weighted sum for image zones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If all pixel values are used to generate contrast data, then the contrast measurement is comprehensive, but the processing time and computational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrast measurement accuracyVSAvoidautofocus processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most relevant pixel values for contrast measurement by dynamically selecting a subset of pixels based on their contribution to contrast information. This extraction principle reduces the data volume processed while maintaining measurement accuracy, directly resolving the contradiction between comprehensive measurement and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by processing only a carefully selected subset of pixels rather than all pixels in the image. The dynamic selection mechanism identifies and processes only those pixels that provide meaningful contrast information, achieving sufficient measurement precision with reduced computational effort and time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Productivity

If fixed pixel values are used for contrast-based autofocus, then the processing is simple and fast, but the accuracy and adaptability to varying lighting conditions deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautofocus processing speedVSAvoidfocus setting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamics into the pixel selection process by dynamically selecting pixels based on their intensity values and reliability metrics. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to adjust to varying lighting conditions and image characteristics, maintaining high measurement precision without sacrificing processing efficiency through intelligent pixel subset selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters used for pixel selection from fixed values to dynamic parameters that adapt to lighting conditions and image characteristics. By using intensity-based and reliability-based selection criteria, the system maintains accuracy across different conditions while keeping processing efficient through selective pixel sampling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If a larger subset of pixel values is selected for contrast data generation, then the contrast measurement is more accurate, but the computational complexity and processing load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefocus metric accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential pixel values needed for accurate focus measurement by applying dynamic selection criteria. This extraction approach identifies and processes only the most informative pixels, achieving high measurement precision while minimizing computational complexity through selective data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by processing a carefully curated subset of pixels rather than all available pixel data. The dynamic selection mechanism ensures that the processed subset provides sufficient contrast information for accurate focus determination, achieving high precision with reduced computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If pixel values from all image zones are processed equally, then the focus determination is comprehensive, but the adaptability to different image zone characteristics is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefocus setting reliabilityVSAvoidadaptability to lighting conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by treating different image zones differently based on their characteristics. The dynamic pixel selection process adapts to local conditions in different zones, selecting pixels based on their intensity and reliability metrics specific to each zone's lighting and content characteristics, thereby maintaining high reliability and adaptability simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamics into the pixel selection process, allowing the system to adapt to varying lighting conditions and image zone characteristics. By dynamically selecting pixels based on local intensity and reliability metrics, the system maintains reliable focus determination across diverse conditions while adapting to local image characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11997384B2Focus setting determination
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 ARM LTD
  • US11997384B2 patent drawing
  • US11997384B2 patent drawing
  • US11997384B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of determining a focus setting for an image capture device. The method comprises, for each of a plurality of image zones: obtaining a first value of a focus metric for the respective image zone using a first image captured with a first focus setting for the image capture device; obtaining a second value of the focus metric for the respective image zone using a second image captured with a second focus setting for the image capture device; and processing the first value and the second value to obtain an estimated focus setting for the respective image zone. The focus setting is determined by performing a weighted sum of the estimated focus setting for at least two of the plurality of image zones.