Autofocusing Optical Instrument Using Multiple Sharpness Functions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing focusing methods for optical instruments, such as microscopes, often encounter difficulties in accurately determining the optimal focus position due to secondary maxima caused by disturbances, leading to incorrect focus adjustments.

Innovation Solution

The method employs multiple sharpness functions to determine the main direction of focus change through gradient calculation and majority decision, adjusting the focus increment based on the focus range and using different functions in near and far focus areas to enhance focusing accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single sharpness function is used for focusing, then the focusing process is simple, but secondary maxima caused by disturbances can lead to incorrect focus position determination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefocusing process complexityVSAvoidfocus position determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the focusing evaluation into multiple independent sharpness functions (e.g., different spatial frequency bands, different image regions, or different focus metrics). Each function evaluates sharpness independently, and the final focus decision is made by combining results from multiple functions through majority voting or weighted aggregation. This segmentation allows the system to overcome secondary maxima in individual functions by relying on consensus across multiple evaluation criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If the focus position is changed by a large increment, then the focusing speed is increased, but the risk of overshooting the optimal focus position increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefocusing speedVSAvoidfocus position accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of the focus increment size based on the current focusing state and evaluation results. When the system detects that it is far from the optimal focus position (e.g., through consistent directional gradients across multiple sharpness functions), it uses larger increments to accelerate convergence. As the system approaches the optimal position, the increment size is automatically reduced to allow precise settling, preventing overshooting. This dynamic adaptation optimizes both focusing speed and accuracy throughout the focusing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2483731B1Automatic focusing method for an optical instrument for magnified viewing of an object
Publication Date: 2021.02.24 CARL ZEISS MICROSCOPY GMBH
  • EP2483731B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2483731B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2483731B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A focusing method for an optical instrument for magnified viewing of an object includes producing at least two images with different focal positions and applying several different sharpness functions. Each function has an absolute extremum which specifies the optimum focal position to be set for the viewing and which lies in a close focus range of the sharpness function adjoined on both sides by a far focus range which contains local secondary extrema. For each of the at least two images an evaluation thereof is performed with the focal position as a variable such that a sharpness function variation direction of the focal position is calculated for each sharpness function in order to arrive at the optimum focal position. A determination is made for main variation direction based on all sharpness function variation directions, which is then used during further focusing.