Autoimmune Nutrient Delivery System Using ML Marker Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current alimentary design systems are inefficient in modifying nutritional delivery for users with autoimmune disorders, leading to a poor nutrient delivery system and program.

Innovation Solution

A system and method using a computing device to identify user-specific autoimmune disorders, generate a marker classifier, and determine an edible program through machine-learning processes to create an arranged list of provider aliment possibilities for optimized nutrient delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If current alimentary design systems are used, then the system structure is simple, but the nutritional delivery efficiency is poor and cannot effectively modify delivery based on autoimmune disorders

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenutritional delivery efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the nutritional delivery process into distinct functional modules: autoimmune disorder detection module, marker identification module, machine learning analysis module, and alimentary recommendation module. Each module handles a specific aspect of the complex task, improving overall efficiency while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-training machine learning models with extensive autoimmune disorder data and marker correlations before actual nutritional delivery optimization. The system also pre-identifies relevant markers and establishes baseline recommendations, enabling rapid response when modifying delivery based on detected disorders without requiring complex real-time computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If machine-learning processes are implemented to identify markers and generate alimentary recommendations, then the precision of nutritional recommendations improves, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisorder identification precisionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by focusing machine learning processes only on identifying specific markers relevant to detected autoimmune disorders rather than analyzing all possible parameters. The system trains models on extensive data (excessive action) to achieve high precision, but during operation uses pre-trained models to reduce real-time computational complexity, applying the full power of machine learning only where needed for marker identification and recommendation generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If tailored nutritional recommendations are generated for each user, then the effectiveness of autoimmune disorder treatment improves, but the time required for analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-training machine learning models with extensive autoimmune disorder data and pre-establishing marker-recommendation correlations. When a user is analyzed, the system quickly matches detected markers against pre-computed recommendations rather than generating recommendations from scratch, significantly reducing analysis time while maintaining tailored effectiveness through the pre-trained models' ability to rapidly identify the most relevant nutritional interventions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where treatment outcomes and user responses are continuously monitored and fed back into the machine learning models. This feedback loop allows the system to refine recommendations over time based on actual effectiveness, improving treatment reliability while reducing analysis time as the models learn from accumulated data and become more efficient at predicting effective interventions for specific marker profiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11211158B1System and method for representing an arranged list of provider aliment possibilities
Publication Date: 2021.12.28 KPN INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US11211158B1 patent drawing
  • US11211158B1 patent drawing
  • US11211158B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for representing an arranged list of alimentary aliment possibilities includes a computing device configured to receive an input of an autoimmune disorder, identify a marker associated with the autoimmune disorder, generate a marker classifier, wherein the marker classifier out puts a disorder state label, determine an aliment instruction set including a plurality of edible programs corresponding to a plurality of provider alimentary possibilities, locate, from each alimentary provider device of a plurality of alimentary provider devices, a plurality of provider aliment possibilities, generate an arranged list of edible programs as a function of the plurality of provider aliment possibilities, obtain a user preference of a provider aliment possibility corresponding to an edible of the plurality of provider alimentary possibilities, and generate a updated arranged list of alimentary possibilities as a function of the user preference and the aliment instruction set.