Autoinjector Drive Chassis Merging Limbs for Compact Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autoinjectors are complex, costly, and environmentally impactful due to their large size, high material usage, and complex assembly processes, which complicates manufacturing, storage, and transportation, especially when requiring low temperatures.

Innovation Solution

A compact autoinjector design featuring a drive chassis with parallel dispensing and trigger limbs, a trigger arm, and a drive spring, which reduces the number of components and simplifies the assembly process, allowing for a smaller form factor and lower material usage, while maintaining functionality for medicament delivery and needle protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional autoinjector designs are used, then reliable medicament delivery is achieved, but device complexity and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemedicament delivery reliabilityVSAvoidautoinjector complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the trigger limb and dispensing limb into a single integrated drive chassis component, reducing the number of parts while maintaining the separate functional pathways needed for reliable medicament delivery. This merging eliminates the need for additional connecting components between trigger and dispensing mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The drive chassis serves multiple functions: it acts as both the trigger mechanism support and the dispensing mechanism support, while also providing structural housing for the drive spring. This multi-functionality reduces overall device complexity without compromising medicament delivery reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If traditional autoinjector designs are used, then functional requirements are met, but material usage and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautoinjector functionalityVSAvoidmaterial usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By merging the trigger limb and dispensing limb into one piece, the patent reduces the total quantity of material required for manufacturing the drive chassis, directly addressing material usage and cost concerns while preserving all necessary functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The drive spring is nested within the hollow interior of the drive chassis, optimizing space utilization and reducing the overall device volume. This nesting arrangement allows efficient packing of components without requiring additional material for separate housing structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Reliability

If traditional autoinjector designs are used, then medicament delivery is ensured, but device volume and storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemedicament deliveryVSAvoiddevice volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The drive spring is positioned inside the hollow drive chassis, and the entire drive chassis is contained within the outer housing. This nested arrangement minimizes device volume while ensuring all components are properly positioned for reliable medicament delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The trigger limb and dispensing limb are arranged in parallel dimensions within the drive chassis, allowing both functional pathways to coexist in a compact volume. This dimensional arrangement enables efficient space utilization without compromising medicament delivery functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If traditional autoinjector designs are used, then complete functionality is achieved, but manufacturing and assembly complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautoinjector functionalityVSAvoidassembly process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The integration of trigger and dispensing limbs into a single molded part dramatically simplifies the assembly process, as fewer components need to be handled, positioned, and secured during manufacturing. This merging maintains complete functionality while improving ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The compact design minimizes material usage, reduces manufacturing and storage costs, and enhances environmental sustainability by reducing the volume required for transport and storage, while ensuring efficient medicament delivery and user feedback mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

the autoinjector comprises a drive spring, wherein the drive spring is arranged within the housing of the autoinjector between a distal housing wall and the drive chassis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS20240416040A1autoinjector
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 MEDMIX SWITZERLAND AG
  • US20240416040A1 patent drawing
  • US20240416040A1 patent drawing
  • US20240416040A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An autoinjector includes a housing and a drive chassis arranged linearly moveable within the housing, the drive chassis including a dispensing limb and a trigger limb, wherein the trigger limb and the dispensing limb are arranged in parallel to one another respectively at least essentially in parallel to one another and are connected to one another at a respective distal end of the dispensing limb and the trigger limb.