Aircraft Autoland Destination Scoring and Obstacle-Aware Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current integrated avionics systems lack the capability to land an aircraft without pilot intervention, even in emergency situations, despite providing advanced navigation and control functionalities.

Innovation Solution

An autoland system that includes a processor and memory to identify potential destinations, calculate merits, receive terrain and obstacle data, and create routes for landing, allowing the aircraft to autonomously traverse and land without pilot intervention by actuating engines or control columns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If integrated avionics systems provide advanced navigation and control functionalities, then the system capability is improved, but the system cannot land the aircraft without pilot intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capabilityVSAvoidautonomous landing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The avionics system performs self-service by automatically selecting destinations, calculating merits, receiving terrain data, creating routes, and controlling aircraft systems to complete the landing process without pilot intervention, enabling the system to serve itself in emergency situations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-identifying multiple potential destinations, pre-calculating merit values for each destination, and pre-receiving terrain and obstacle data before the actual landing is required, allowing rapid autonomous decision-making when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Extent of automation

If the aircraft autonomously selects destinations and creates routes, then the extent of automation is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous landing capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous landing function is segmented into distinct modular components: destination identification module, merit calculation module, terrain data reception module, route creation module, and aircraft control module. Each module handles a specific task, making the complex system manageable and maintainable while achieving high automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If the system calculates merit for each potential destination, then the landing safety is improved, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanding safetyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates merit values for multiple potential destinations simultaneously rather than sequentially evaluating one at a time. By performing partial calculations in parallel for several destinations and selecting the optimal one, the system achieves thorough safety evaluation without excessive time loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11710417B2Emergency autoland system
Publication Date: 2023.07.25 GARMIN INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US11710417B2 patent drawing
  • US11710417B2 patent drawing
  • US11710417B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Autoland systems and processes for landing an aircraft without pilot intervention are described. In implementations, the autoland system includes a memory operable to store one or more modules and at least one processor coupled to the memory. The processor is operable to execute the one or more modules to identify a plurality of potential destinations for an aircraft. The processor can also calculate a merit for each potential destination identified, select a destination based upon the merit; receive terrain data and/or obstacle data, the including terrain characteristic(s) and/or obstacle characteristic(s); and create a route from a current position of the aircraft to an approach fix associated with the destination, the route accounting for the terrain characteristic(s) and/or obstacle characteristic(s). The processor can also cause the aircraft to traverse the route, and cause the aircraft to land at the destination without requiring pilot intervention.