Automated Article Transfer Between Mixed Tray Types

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual transfer of items between different types of trays, such as from automation-compatible to non-automation-compatible trays, is time-consuming, imprecise, and prone to errors, leading to potential damage or processing delays.

Innovation Solution

A tray content transfer system utilizing a frame with a paddle assembly, lifting assembly, and item support platform, controlled by a controller, to automate the transfer process, ensuring precise and efficient movement of items between trays without suspending them over gaps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual transfer of items between trays is performed, then flexibility in handling different tray types is maintained, but transfer time increases and error rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in handling different tray typesVSAvoidtransfer time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary transfer mechanism consisting of a transfer tray and transfer arms that mediate between different tray types. The transfer tray can receive items from various source trays and deliver them to different destination trays, providing adaptability while automating the transfer process to reduce time and errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The transfer mechanism is designed with universal capabilities to handle multiple tray types (automation-compatible and non-automation-compatible trays). The system can perform both manual-like flexibility and automated efficiency by using a multi-functional transfer platform that adapts to different tray configurations through programmable control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If manual transfer of items between trays is performed, then operational simplicity is maintained, but precision and accuracy decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidtransfer precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical transfer operations with an automated mechanical system controlled by a controller. The transfer arms and lifting mechanisms provide precise, repeatable movements that maintain ease of operation through programmatic control while significantly improving transfer precision and reducing errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors and controllers that provide feedback to monitor and adjust transfer operations. This feedback mechanism ensures precise item handling and placement while maintaining operational simplicity through automated control loops that compensate for variations in tray positions and item orientations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If items are transferred between trays at different heights, then adaptability to various tray configurations is improved, but risk of item damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to tray configurationsVSAvoidrisk of item damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent addresses height differences between trays by introducing a vertical dimension to the transfer mechanism through lifting assemblies. These assemblies can raise or lower items during transfer, allowing the system to adapt to various tray height configurations while maintaining gentle, controlled movements that minimize the risk of item damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The transfer mechanism incorporates cushioning elements and controlled deceleration features that protect items before they reach their destination. The system slows down items as they approach the target tray and uses cushioned surfaces to absorb impact, thereby adapting to height differences while preventing damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Productivity

If automated transfer system is implemented, then transfer efficiency and accuracy are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransfer efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated transfer system is divided into modular segments including transfer arms, lifting assemblies, sensors, and control units. This segmentation allows each component to perform a specific function efficiently while making the overall system easier to maintain and operate. The modular design improves transfer efficiency without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates self-adjusting and self-monitoring features that reduce the need for complex external control. Sensors automatically detect tray positions and item presence, and the controller autonomously adjusts transfer parameters, thereby improving efficiency while keeping the operational complexity manageable through intelligent automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250276861A1System for transferring articles from a container
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 US POSTAL SERVICE
  • US20250276861A1 patent drawing
  • US20250276861A1 patent drawing
  • US20250276861A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated system for transferring articles from a container. An item transfer system includes a frame configured to receive a first tray and a second tray, a movable paddle assembly, a frame, and a plurality of actuators. The system is configured to transfer articles from the first tray to the second tray by an automated process including securing the articles within the first tray with the paddle assembly, moving a lifting assembly or an item support platform such that the articles are in a slidable configuration relative to the first tray, moving the paddle assembly and/or the item support platform in one or more linear translations to remove the items from the first tray and place the items above the second tray, and releasing the items into the second tray.