Automated Biological Assay Orchestration for Batch Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current pre-analytical and analyzer instruments require significant technician involvement, are prone to operator error, and lack integration, leading to inefficiencies in sample processing and analysis.

Innovation Solution

A system architecture that coordinates automated sample processing among multiple analysis devices using an orchestration computing device, minimizing operator intervention by optimizing sample batching, resource allocation, and instrument integration based on real-time data from laboratory information systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated analyzer instruments are used to perform multistep processes, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample processing throughputVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into separate functional modules: pre-analytical instruments for sample preparation, analyzer instruments for testing, and an orchestration core for coordination. Each module operates independently but is integrated through standardized communication protocols, allowing high throughput while managing complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An orchestration core computing device acts as an intermediary between pre-analytical and analyzer instruments. This mediator receives sample information, determines optimal processing sequences, coordinates resource allocation, and manages data flow between instruments, thereby enabling automated high-throughput processing without overwhelming system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If pre-analytical instruments automatically transfer samples, then ease of operation is improved, but loss of time increases due to manual pairing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated sample transferVSAvoidmanual pairing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Sample containers are pre-associated with identification codes and metadata before being loaded into the system. The orchestration core pre-retrieves assay instructions and prepares processing sequences in advance, so when samples are automatically transferred, all necessary information is already matched and ready, eliminating manual pairing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies of sample identification information and assay instructions that are stored and referenced by the orchestration core. These digital copies enable automatic matching and retrieval of processing parameters without requiring physical manual pairing or human intervention to match samples with their test protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If technicians manually transfer samples between instruments, then reliability is improved through direct control, but loss of time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample transfer accuracyVSAvoidsample processing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated sample transfer where the pre-analytical instrument automatically moves prepared samples to the analyzer instrument without technician intervention. The orchestration core coordinates this transfer by determining optimal sequences and allocating resources, achieving both high reliability through controlled automation and high productivity by eliminating manual handling time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the orchestration core continuously monitors instrument status, sample processing progress, and resource availability. This real-time feedback enables dynamic adjustment of processing sequences and resource allocation, ensuring reliable sample transfer coordination while maximizing throughput by optimizing the flow between instruments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If continuous stream processing is used, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases due to batch coordination requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous sample processingVSAvoidbatch management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts processing sequences based on real-time instrument availability, sample priorities, and resource constraints. The orchestration core continuously optimizes the processing order to maintain continuous throughput while adapting to changing conditions, managing batch coordination complexity through flexible dynamic scheduling rather than rigid fixed sequences

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes processing parameters such as batch size, processing speed, and instrument allocation based on current system state and sample characteristics. By dynamically adjusting these parameters, the system maintains continuous productive processing while managing complexity through parameter optimization rather than complex fixed batch management protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250336490A1Systems and methods of efficiently performing biological assays
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 BECTON DICKINSON & CO
  • US20250336490A1 patent drawing
  • US20250336490A1 patent drawing
  • US20250336490A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated laboratory system for processing biological samples in a batch type manner is disclosed. In one embodiment, the system may receive assay instructions for biological samples processing among a plurality of devices. The devices may include a pre-analytical instrument and one or more analysis systems. The system may include an orchestration core application for determining an order of performance for the assays ordered for the samples.