Automated Audio Tuning Reports for Multi-Speaker Room Performance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Tuning audio systems in large-scale environments with multiple speakers and microphones is challenging due to the complexity of equipment configurations and the need for expert setup, and existing methods fail to accurately represent the performance of multiple speakers using single speaker tests.

Innovation Solution

An automated tuning process using a controller to identify and tune multiple speakers and microphones on a network, applying test signals sequentially to detect operational channels, establish noise levels, and optimize parameters for audio performance, including equalization and noise reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a single speaker test is used to represent multiple speakers, then the testing process is simplified, but the audio performance accuracy is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting process simplicityVSAvoidaudio performance accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the audio testing process by assigning unique frequency tones to different speaker groups (e.g., left speakers at 100Hz, right speakers at 200Hz, center speakers at 300Hz). This allows simultaneous testing of multiple speakers while maintaining the ability to analyze each group's performance separately, thus achieving both testing efficiency and measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic test signals with distinct frequencies for different speaker groups. By playing these periodic signals simultaneously and analyzing the frequency spectrum of the captured audio, the system can identify and evaluate each speaker group's performance without requiring sequential individual testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Manufacturing precision

If expert teams manually setup and test audio equipment, then configuration accuracy is improved, but installation time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration accuracyVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated self-testing and self-configuration capabilities. The controller automatically plays test signals through speakers, captures responses via microphones, analyzes the audio data to determine speaker locations and performance characteristics, and configures audio parameters without requiring expert manual intervention. This maintains configuration accuracy while dramatically reducing installation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual expert operations with automated electronic testing and analysis. Instead of experts physically setting up and testing each device, the controller electronically generates test signals, automatically captures and analyzes responses, and computes configuration parameters, substituting human expertise with automated signal processing algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If multiple test signals are provided to multiple speakers simultaneously, then testing efficiency is improved, but signal detection and analysis complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidsignal analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system assigns distinct local qualities (unique frequency characteristics) to test signals for different speaker groups. Left speakers receive 100Hz tones, right speakers receive 200Hz tones, and center speakers receive 300Hz tones. This frequency differentiation allows the analysis system to easily separate and identify responses from each speaker group using simple spectral analysis, avoiding the need for complex signal separation algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the frequency parameter of test signals to differentiate between speaker groups. By assigning distinct frequency values (100Hz, 200Hz, 300Hz) to different speaker groups, the system enables simultaneous testing while maintaining simple analysis through frequency-based signal identification, thus improving efficiency without significantly increasing analysis complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250220348A1Automated audio tuning launch procedure and report
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 BIAMP SYST LLC
  • US20250220348A1 patent drawing
  • US20250220348A1 patent drawing
  • US20250220348A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A process may include detecting, via a controller, one or more microphones and one or more speakers in an area, measuring audio performance levels of the one or more microphones and the one or more speakers to identify one or more of a noise floor and a reverberation level, identifying an initial room performance rating based on the audio performance levels, applying optimized speaker tuning levels to the one or more speakers and the one or more microphones, measuring, via the one or more microphones, optimized audio performance levels of the one or more speakers based on the applied optimized speaker tuning levels, and generating a report to identify an optimized room performance rating based on the applied optimized speaker tuning.